Here is my reply – and I wonder why Quora didn’t like it.

I keep wondering about this question since long.
My feeling is, in Vedic tradition, human beings are not the ‘crown of the creation’ as in the Abrahamic religions. There are other conscious, intelligent beings apart from humans. The Saptarishis (seven sages) for example are in my view not humans as we are.

My feeling is, a lot of the Vedic knowledge was GIVEN. It is not possible for humans to come to the conclusions of Surya Siddhanta for example. Mapping of the sky is not possible merely by observation.

Even the Upanishadic realisation that this ‘reality’ is Maya, a temporary appearance on the eternal truth (Brahman), and doing a clear analysis of Maya, including the 5 elements, is not easy to discover for humans who were supposed to be primitive thousands of years ago.

The usual explanation: they saw it in deep meditation, is unlikely. In deep meditation one may experience an oceanic oneness with all, but it’s unlikely to get inputs about certain constellations in the sky.

Let’s take Ramanujan Srinivasan. He says, his Kul Devi Namagiri gave him the mathematical formulas in dream. Should we not consider the Devi as real as we humans are?
Patanjali, who gave us the Ashtanga Yoga, was supposedly a Naga.
Or who built the Kailash Mandir? It is doubtful that it were humans.

I find it strange: Hindus have so much information about different beings especially in the Puranas, yet it almost seems, as if westerners nowadays take invisible spiritual forces – positive and negative ones – more seriously and for more real than Hindus do.

The reason may be that especially Hindus are very focused on education. And education considers these invisible powers just as figments of imagination and to believe in them as ridiculous. Yet by now we should know that education has an agenda. And it is NOT to make us free and happy and realise who we really are.

While Devas and Asuras are more powerful and long lived than humans, they play their part in Maya depending on their gunas (Devas sattvic, Asuras rajasic (egoistic) and Rakshasas tamasic).
Humans have the advantage that they can discover their oneness with Brahman by first choosing satva and then transcending the gunas.
By Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider checking out my books:
“Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” available in English and Hindi.
in English Rs 293 (also on Kindle)

in Hindi: Rs 330
https://www.amazon.in/Hindu-Muslimon-Isaiyon-Vampanthion-Aakrman/dp/9391154832

“Thank you India”, Rs 440, also on Kindle

The post Quora removed again one of my answers first appeared on Maria Wirth.

She told me that most of her college mates, who had been to English medium schools, had become atheists. Yet she loves her Hindu faith and we had a good conversation about the depth of her tradition.

When I was studying at Hamburg University in the 1970s, atheism was fashionable, too. Peer pressure also did its part. None of my friends went to church on Sundays, including me.

Google explains the driving factors for atheism in this way:
“Studies suggest that higher levels of education, increased access to scientific information and secular philosophies via the internet, and a generational shift away from organized religion are the primary drivers of this growth.”

This sounds, as if atheism is more rational than belief in a God. Isn’t it?

The prominent Israeli historian, Yuval Noah Harari, who was hosted and praised also on an Indian TV channel, and is a regular speaker at the WEF, also said, “It’s ridiculous to believe in a God and a soul.”
He is a heavy-weight. His books sell in tens of millions. So, he should be right, isn’t it?

Let’s try to find out:

Harari didn’t explain what he means by God and soul. And the definition is of course crucial. Most people may say,” Isn’t it clear? God is the English word for the Creator of the universe, for the Highest Truth.”

Few will doubt, except some atheists, that this universe, and we included, has to come from somewhere and ‘God’ is given as the answer. He is seen as the ultimate power, from which all else emanates.
Now how to describe this great power? Here lies probably the reason why atheists don’t believe in God:

Somehow, the Abrahamic view of God has taken predominance, maybe, because the majority of humans are Christians or Muslims:

God is seen as a male, all-knowing, all-powerful superhuman entity in heaven. He has allegedly conveyed to a few special persons what he wants from us humans. He is also compassionate and loving. But he loves only those who believe in him and who follow the instructions sent down through those special envoys. Those who don’t follow his instructions will be sent to eternal hellfire.

This view is reinforced and fear of eternal hell is instilled in children, generation after generation. Even in most adults, this belief has become part of their mental make-up.

However, though Christianity, Islam and Judaism go all back to Abraham and have similar views regarding the creator, each one claims that its own God alone is the true one and needs to be worshipped.
Except for Judaism, which does not want converts due to its belief that Jews are chosen by God to rule the world, the two other Abrahamic religions see it as their duty to make the whole world believe in their particular God. That means, Christianity claims all must become Christians, and Islam claims all must become Muslims to gain entry into heaven. And they can be (and have been) ruthless in pursuing their goal.

This notion of God needs urgent scrutiny – not only by outsiders, but also by insiders in those Abrahamic faiths.

Is it possible that the Supreme is a sort of superhuman entity and heavily biased towards his followers and unforgiving towards ‘others’? It’s difficult to believe that this kind of God is the highest truth.

So, does it mean that Yuval Noah Harari and atheists are right?

Let’s look at a different view about God before deciding on this important issue.
Here, ancient India comes in:

In ancient times, long before Judaism, Christianity or Islam appeared, Vedic Dharma (today called Hinduism) had a very mature understanding of the Highest Truth which is called Brahman in the Vedas (there are other names, like Paramatman, Tat..).
Brahman is not personal, not a superhuman entity, not male or female, but the most subtle, invisible, conscious, one basis of all. The Rishis declared, “Brahman is not what the eyes can see, but That whereby the eyes can see. Brahman is not what the mind can think but That whereby the mind can think” (Kena Upanishad).

They realised that this varied universe is a mistaken perception of the one Brahman due to its innate creative Shakti or Maya. Maya makes this manifold world appear as a Lila (play) on the one Brahman. It can be compared with a movie that plays temporarily on the one screen (Brahman) or like a dream of Brahman.

The Rishis give another example how it is possible to miss the truth though it is right in front of our eyes: we go to a potter’s shop. We see all types of cups and jugs, but we miss to see the mud from which they are made. The mud is the essence of the temporary form of a cup. It remains after the cup is broken.

Similarly, Brahman, best described as pure consciousness, is the essence of our person and remains when our person has ceased to exist.

Yet do the Rishis have any evidence for their view?

Yes, they have. The Rishis vigorously and intelligently enquired into the truth which is reflected in the ancient texts, especially the Upanishads. For example, they give criteria for the absolute truth:
One: it must be at all times – past, present and future,
Two: it must not need anything else to shine or in other words, it has to be self- evident.

Those two criteria dismiss the whole universe as not absolutely true. Apart from the fact that it is not always, it also needs something to ‘shine’ – it needs consciousness.

So, what is left?

The Rishis came to the conclusion that the subtle, conscious basis of everything is left – Sat-Chit-Ananda. It is here right now as pure, thought-free awareness. It is not some separate thing at some different place, like in heaven. It is our very Being and therefore there is a chance to ‘real-ise’ (know it as real) by turning inwards to what is unchanging and true in us and develop devotion for it.

But why should we do this? Why should we try to still the mental chatter at least sometimes for a little while? Is there any benefit? Yes, there is an immense benefit:

The Rishis claim that our essence is not only the source of valuable inspiration, but is also most blissful – far more blissful than what any worldly enjoyment can give. And the Rishis spoke from experience.

This Indian knowledge is very valuable and needs to spread. And even atheists may come to the conclusion that the Indian Rishis have a point.
Yet instead, Western media and even academia often demean the Hindu tradition as primitive and even demonic. Why? Do they not want humans to know that ‘God’ is within them??
By Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
“Why Hindu Dharma is under attack…” both in English and Hindi
“Thank you India” in English,
also in Kindle and abroad available.
Link: https://www.amazon.in/s?k=maria+wirth

The post Are Atheists right? Or did they get the meaning of “God” wrong? first appeared on Maria Wirth.

The world has changed significantly within the last few years. Many of these changes are very concerning, especially the casual talk by some politicians about the possibility of a nuclear war, and the dangers of artificial intelligence, which will not only render many jobless and possibly directly influence our thoughts, but may even go out of human control. Further, the big economic downturn in many countries and the increasing censorship of speech. It seems as if the world is moving towards a China-type controlled one-world society.

In this scenario, social media is both a boon and a bane. It is a bane, when it keeps our attention, addictively, on scrolling for ever more information or entertainment, without giving us a break to be present in the here and now—the most important place and time of our life. And our phones may even lure us into debasing our life with violent computer games or pornography.
Yet, on the other hand, social media has also contributed greatly to waking people up to what is happening. ‘Deep State’ has become a household word. Mainstream media has lost the trust of many. Even science, academia, and medicine have come under scrutiny and do not look so good and innocent any longer. Too many claims, ridiculed by the media as ‘conspiracy theories’, have unfortunately been confirmed as true.

There is another, very positive aspect which gets traction, and that too, is thanks to social media platforms—more and more people are searching for the Truth—not merely questioning facts that are presented by the media, but searching for the big, transcendental Truth about God and themselves.
Many Westerners are going back to Christianity and declaring their faith in Jesus. Even a decade ago, it would have been inconceivable that Tucker Carlson, a big American influencer, would ask Russell Brand, a big British influencer, on stage to lead an audience of ten thousand in prayers.

I consider it a good development for Westerners. The erosion of belief in a Supreme Power was obviously planned—starting in Russia and China with communism and taking root in the West with the Hippie movement of the 1960s.
Now, there is a pushback against the agenda which wants us to identify only with the body, and focus only on sensual enjoyment, never mind how low that enjoyment may be. The Zeitgeist is changing, even though the elite still try to convince us that ‘It is ridiculous to believe in a God or a soul’ (a recent quote by the celebrated historian and author, Yuval Noah Harari who is a regular at the World Economic Forum).

Yet, I wish that people all over the world would know about Bharat’s Eternal Wisdom, called Sanatana Dharma. Or rather, I wish they would know what this Eternal Wisdom is really about and not be influenced by false, mischievous claims by those who don’t want this Wisdom to be known.
The reason: Sanatana Dharma is closer to the Truth than Abrahamic religions.

Devotion to God or Jesus or Allah is definitely helpful in life. But doubts may arise from time to time, because those religions are all about ‘belief in a story’ that happened several hundred years ago. It is all about ‘thinking’ and not about ‘who or what enables thinking’.

Since ancient times, India was the ‘Land of Wisdom’. Vedic wisdom is not based on belief in a story. It gives knowledge about the Absolute Truth and asks us to verify it by experiencing it within ourselves—true Self-Realisation.

The most important knowledge is: We are not small persons in a big world, but are one with Brahman. And Brahman, though indescribable, is best described as limitless, blissful Consciousness, out of which, this world and everything in it, ‘appears’. It means, the world and our small, individual selves are not solid. They are more like Virtual Reality, or in Indian terminology, Maya. What is ‘solid’ and really true is only our essence or self—Pure Consciousness.

When I heard this for the first time back in April 1980, at the Kumbh Mela in Haridwar—it immediately made sense to me. For the first time, I got convincing answers to questions that had troubled me since my teens.
Questions like:
– What is most important in life?
– Is there a God?
– Is death the end of me?

These questions were now replaced with the most important question:
– Who am I really?
Yet, this question cannot be answered with words. It needs to be ‘known’ within. The goal of our life is to realise the truth of who we are.

I wanted to dedicate my life to search for the Truth and stay on in India, because the country was just more conducive for spiritual search. Yet to do this, I needed a longer visa and earn some money.
So, in 1981, I wrote my first article—about insights I had gained while being in the presence of Sri Anandamayi Ma and other great spiritual personalities like Devaraha Baba, and from reading numerous books and sitting still for many hours in meditation. I felt that this precious wisdom, which is still alive in India, is lacking in the West.

I was fortunate. This first article was published in the German magazine Psychologie Heute; two other magazines reprinted it. The editor asked me to continue writing, as he had rarely seen such clarity regarding Indian Wisdom. He even gave me an advance for my next article—a report on a conference in Mumbai on ‘The Convergence between Indian Wisdom and Modern Science’. Obviously, back then in 1981, India’s Wisdom was appreciated.

During the first 20 years, I stayed in the ‘spiritual Bharat’ of ashrams, pilgrimage places, sadhus, and mainly met Indians who were connected to their roots. I thought that all Indians were like this. After all, their tradition and scriptural heritage is a treasure trove.

Only when I moved into a ‘normal’ environment in 2001, did I realise that Hindu Dharma is not only ignored in education, but also viewed negatively by the media and academia.

I realised only then that on the one hand, many Indians had converted to Islam and Christianity during the long foreign rule, and naturally, their new religion indoctrinated them into believing how bad their previous faith was.
And, on the other hand, even many Hindus have no idea about their spiritual treasure. Especially the convent-educated Hindus who often dismiss their tradition as ‘primitive’, without knowing even a basic text like the Bhagavad Gita.
They are like those proverbial people who are sitting on a box of gold but do not know it, and instead go for artificial jewellery elsewhere.

This ‘box of gold’ has many aspects.
The most important one is:
India has preserved the most profound philosophical and spiritual insights of the ancient rishis (sages), and their methods on how to fulfil one’s life’s purpose and how to be truly free and fearless.
Yet it seems, free and fearless people are unwanted in our times. Otherwise, it is hard to explain why the media and academia hardly ever mention anything positive about India. It almost seems as if they do not want to draw any attention to India, maybe because they fear that people might discover that great treasure.

This book is a collection of forty-three of my over 200 articles. Some are unchanged, like my letter to Pope Francis, who has meanwhile passed away, or my reply to Zakir Naik, a radical Islamic preacher. Many are updated or have otherwise been improved.

The main topics are:
– The truth about who we are, what is our purpose in life, and where can we discover true love and happiness.
– Some aspects of the living Hindu culture.
– How Hinduism relates to Buddhism and to the Abrahamic religions.
– What is special in Hinduism—like Rebirth or the regard for animals.
– Why is Hinduism attacked so much?
– The great influence that India had on German philosophers.

In recent times, attacks on Hinduism have become very vicious. Hindu Gods are called demons not only by Christian missionaries but also by Western academics and certain Indian politicians who want the faith of the Hindus to be ‘eradicated’.

There are mischievous attempts to associate Hinduism with dark satanic cults, whose existence in secret societies of the topmost global elite can no longer be ignored. Those cults are the complete opposite of the benevolent Sanatan (= Eternal) Hindu tradition.

Hinduism’s focus is on a dharmic (righteous) life and, to overcome one’s ignorance regarding this illusionary world and to realise one’s true Self.
In contrast, the focus of those satanic cults is on achieving pleasures, riches, and power in this ephemeral world, even if it requires selling one’s soul to the devil.

Are the attacks on Hinduism an expression of the spiritual fight of the forces of darkness against the forces of light? Of the egoistic Asuras against the benevolent Devas?

Bharat is probably the only country in the world, where the Devas are worshipped every day in thousands of temples across this ancient, vast land.
And, Bharat is probably the only country in the world, where the knowledge about our essential divinity is still alive; and, where not only countless sadhus, but also many ordinary Hindus dedicate some time daily to connect with divinity.

The vicious attempts of reviling the Hindu tradition need to be countered. At the same time, the precious wisdom of the ancient Vedas, which uplifts and gives meaning to life, needs to be spread.
People will then realise that Hinduism is not what mainstream media, Western academia, or the clergy of Abrahamic religions want us to believe. Rather, it is our best guide to true fulfillment and love.
I hope this book contributes in spreading this profound knowledge and inspires readers to search for true love and happiness within.

by Maria Wirth

the books are available on Amazon, PadhegaIndia, Hindueshop
in Hindi https://www.amazon.in/dp/9391154832
in English https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655
abroad the English version is available, also on Kindle.
My earlier Book “Thank you India”, too is on Amazon.

The post Why Hindu Dharma is under attack? first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Insights from a VIP Sadhu

On the compound next to Yoga Niketan, right above the gorge of the Ganga, three sadhus were living in simple huts. One of those sadhus sat the whole day on his tiny veranda and devotedly scribbled into a big book placed on a wooden stand before him. Two more big books were spread out near him. He translated the Yoga Vashishtha into English using both the Hindi and Sanskrit versions for reference. The Yoga Vashishtha is an ancient teaching, which the guru Vashishtha imparted to Ram, the prince of Ayodhya, when he came back from a pilgrimage and had lost all interest in worldly life.
Prior to my trek to Gomukh, James, an American, who also lived in Yoga Niketan and daily visited the sadhu, had taken me along and introduced me to him.
Meanwhile James had left; and I went alone to Brahma Chaitanya or BC, as the sadhu was called. He was an impressive, powerful character in his late fifties, tall and strong, his matted hair so long, that he could use it as a cushion, his laughter louder than even the roar of the Ganga and his eyes sparkling with humour and charm. He was quite naturally a VIP among the sadhus and the president of the sadhu community in Gangotri. As he came from a wealthy family and had been an engineer, confident behaviour and commanding authority came easily to him and this self-assured conduct stayed with him as a sadhu.

Early in life, he became interested in spirituality, read a lot and practised pranayama, but he was young and did not want to be celibate. So, he married and had two children.
When he was in his late thirties, he however had enough of family life and, one fine day, left his wife and teenaged sons. He had thought about it for a long time and had tested himself, he explained. Then he was sure. He wanted to become a sadhu.
However, his wife traced him in Uttarkashi and was adamant that he came back home with her to sort out some inheritance issue. He yielded. Yet soon after, he left his family for good. His wife discovered him in Gangotri, too, but now she respected his wish.

He told me, what happened, when he begged for the first time:
It was in Haridwar. He still had a few hundred Rupees in his pocket, but now wanted to start his new life – without the safety net of a bank account and with full trust in providence. He stretched out his hand towards an elderly gentleman. As a reaction, he did not get any alms but a furious rebuke. “You should be ashamed, young man! Go to one of the ashrams which offer free food for sadhus!”
The newly baked sadhu was greatly annoyed, went straight into a restaurant and ordered a meal. Then he checked into a hotel. In the night, his conscience troubled him. “So quickly am I offended? Only because of a passing remark?”
Next morning, he gifted his travel case to a boy in the hotel and threw the rest of his money into the Ganges. “I now fully belong to you. You have to look after me now”, he told his Ganga Ma. From then on, he did not face any problems. He went to the centres, which served food to sadhus. He specifically mentioned that he joined the queue like everyone else.

The talks with him were highly interesting and he had, unexpectedly, an exquisite library in his hut – books by ancient and modern Indian and even Chinese masters, and by Zen- and Tibetan Buddhists.
Our conversations in the afternoon became routine and I looked forward to them. Afterwards he often dived into his hut and came back with a book in his hand. The first book he gave me to read was “Jnana Yoga” by Swami Vivekananda. It was that very first book that I had bought in Kanyakumari at the Vivekananda Memorial. Strangely, now it did not touch me so much anymore. Books like the “Shiva Sutras” or the “Spanda Karika” about the philosophy of Kashmir Shaivism, which flourished in Kashmir in the 11th century, I found now more appealing and enjoyed studying those texts in the beautiful surroundings at the height of over 3000 meters with snow-capped mountains standing guard.

BC made fun of the important looking, but unnecessary activities in the world and advised me, “Turn inward. You will enjoy it.” He handed me a poem of Chuang Tzu, a Chinese master, who had quite accurately described the ‘Active Life’ already over 2000 years ago:
“What would become of business without a market of fools? What would become of labour, if there were no superfluous objects to be made?” he asked for example already at that time. And his ironic advice: “Produce! Get results! Make money! Make friends! Make changes! Or you will die of despair!”

On BC’s advice, I bought a mala, a kind of rosary, made from 108 beads from the sacred Rudraksha tree in one of the shops near the temple and sat for hours on my bed repeating mantras. I was generally feeling well and when I woke up at night, I heard the mantra repeating itself. Yet sometimes I also felt heavy and down. How would my life go on?

One day BC suggested, “Now I will cure you from feeling small and unwell.” Then he asked, while pointing around himself with a sweeping gesture of his hand, “Whose world is this? Yours or mine?” And he answered himself, “Mine! You appear in it. In the same way is everything what you perceive your world. Everything in your world is there to help you. My world is different. You are alone. Nobody influences you.”
On one hand, he was right, but only on one hand, as everything that is put in words touches only one aspect of the truth. Certainly, no sentence can hold the truth.
Later, when he talked about virtual reality and informatics, he suddenly declared: “We all are only mechanic robots.” He mentioned scientific research, which claims that emotions depend on genes, hormones and so on. For example, the attraction between man and woman is based on testosterone and estrogen. “It just happens. You don’t have a part in it. You simply watch. Don’t get involved in what happens”, he advised.

I remembered that I had brought a bar of chocolate for him. “Do you eat chocolate?” I asked. Because sometimes he looked very holy, for example said, that he does not like conversing on worldly topics, and I considered it possible that he had renounced such worldly pleasures. “Yes, of course I eat chocolate”, he immediately replied.
He told me that once an American accused him of wasting his talent. “You should give lectures in the West”, he had said. BC answered him, “I have here everything I need. I get daily two meals.”
“Meals okay. But if you want chocolate, you have to do something for it”, the American had replied.
“Look! I even get chocolate!” he exclaimed and once again burst into roaring laughter.

BC was nice to me. He did not like to talk to other sadhus, because they were not really interested in spirituality, he said. “Most of them are sexually frustrated and some even keep women. They give an excuse by saying that the ancient rishis also had women.” He suddenly became loud and thundered, “If someone has not finished with his sex drive, he has no place here.”
“Do you shout at me?” I asked.
“No, never”, he suddenly became quiet, friendly, explaining. I felt that he might have shouted at himself. It probably was not always easy for him to stick to his vow of sexual abstinence.
“What happens if a sadhu breaks his vow of celibacy?” I asked and thought of the punishment, which in Buddhism was ordained for a monk – the expulsion from the monastery.
“Nothing happens. He falls, gets up and falls again.” He had made a slip of the tongue and hurriedly corrected himself, “and tries again.”

“Only few are really interested and do their work properly”, he said. “A doctor from Amma’s ashram, who runs up to Gangotri whenever Amma travels overseas, is one of them. He is genuine. A young woman is also genuine. She flew to Paris when she was 17 to learn fashion design. But this fancy world did not suit her. She informed her parents that she wanted to take sanyas. They were not pleased. They had money and wanted a comfortable life for their daughter. Yet she was determined and got her way. She lives now under very simple conditions here in Gangotri”, he said.
“You also belong to those who are genuine”, he flattered me and suggested to come earlier so that we had more time for our conversations, as he daily left at 4.30 in the afternoon for his food in an ashram.
I liked BC. He had those traits that I was lacking: strength, confidence and a loud voice. I had always been on the quiet, shy side and my voice does not become loud, even if I try.

“All spiritual seekers are unhappy”, BC declared out of the blue one day. “You, too”, he said and hit a tender spot. Was I happy? Not particularly, I had to admit. “They have the knowledge, but something holds them back”, he continued. “Be like a lion! Break free! What can the world give you? All faces are like in a movie. Don’t get entangled in the plot! When you die, the movie ends anyway. Throw the film roll away – now already! Throw out your thoughts! You are greater than the film, which consists of thoughts. Do your work well and sincerely. Let the others think what they want. Follow your conviction. Help is always available”, he encouraged me.

I sat either in front of my hut and studied ancient scriptures or inside and meditated. During the first few weeks in Gangotri, I made hardly any contact with others. It was an intense time, and it slowly became clearer to me what ‘pure awareness’ signifies.
“Look at those snow-capped peaks over there, but nevertheless stay with your awareness inside”, BC advised me. “Try to be aware of the unity behind the apparent duality – be aware of the white paper and also perceive the black print on it. Be attentive! Give your attention not mainly to the objects, but to attention itself”, he demanded. I tried it and got an idea what he meant.

Once he gave me the ‘Golden Letters’ by Garab Dorje, an ancient Tibetan master, after he had again dived into his hut. They were a treasure, like the Shiva Sutras, and I copied them by hand into my diary, because there was no copy machine in Gangotri.
The content of those letters is simple, yet very subtle. The main thing is to recognise that this fresh, immediate awareness of the present moment is the truth that is sought after. It is ever present – this ordinary, thought free awareness – now in this moment. Realise this ordinary awareness as your true nature and stay with it, because everything else, which means all appearances in this world, are only modifications of this basic awareness and therefore secondary.

BC shared my excitement regarding the Golden Letters. He suggested that during my next meditation I completely relax and then suddenly and loudly shout “Phat”. This would cause the pure awareness to rise up. In the evening, I tried it and it had a tremendous effect. It felt so beautiful that I didn’t want to move. Joy mixed with gratefulness. As if something had opened – an insight into my Self.
In the next morning a hint of bliss was still felt. Later it disappeared, yet now it was easier to discover it again. My own immediate, ever-present awareness had now become more familiar. I was sure that with time it would become dearer and dearer. I was grateful for this gift and better understood Ramana Maharshi’s saying: “You are always enlightened.” The true, inconceivable basis on which the mind builds its dreamlike castles is indeed always lovingly present.

BC suffered since long from back pain. One morning the pain became unbearable and he could not get out of bed. The doctor from Amma’s ashram advised him to go to the hospital in Rishikesh for a check-up and accompanied him.
When BC came back after a fortnight, he felt better and decided to stay in Gangotri for the winter as usual, even though everybody advised against it. It was only end of September and already ice-cold.

“Last year a Frenchman paid for my winter provisions”, he told me, and I knew why. I felt obliged.
“I will pay for it this year”, I offered. “How much is needed?”
“5000 Rupees are enough.”
I had not expected that much but had forgotten the cigarettes which he smoked one after the other.
Later I came to know that every November before the temple closes, a businessman from Punjab sends a truck with provisions up to Gangotri, which supplies the seven or eight sadhus who usually stay through the winter with their basic needs. BC had not given out this information. Yet I did not mind. He simply needed more than others. I was grateful, and money could not possibly compensate for what he had given me. Pure awareness as my own inner being had become more recognizable through the contact with him and his books.

Four years later, in August 2005, I went once again to Gangotri and looked forward to seeing BC.
“Brahma Chaitanya is no more”, the manager of Yoga Niketan informed me, even before he unlocked a hut for me. “He died completely unexpected last month in Delhi.”
I really felt sorry. He had been so full of strength and life. I did not understand how he could have gone to Delhi in the hottest season. He himself had told me that he would not leave Gangotri again. Only his ash would be carried down into the plains by his Ganga Ma.

I heard two versions why he went to Delhi in the peak of summer:
A well-known, ‘big’ Swami from Delhi wanted to meet him and sent two of his followers to Gangotri to request him to come. BC declined. However, they came again and urged him. That time he yielded, maybe because the Swami had offered to arrange an Ayurvedic treatment for him. Yet nobody knew why the Swami wanted to meet him.
The other version said that BC wanted to go to Delhi on his own wish for Ayurvedic treatment and the Swami arranged it for him.

It would surprise me, if BC had wanted to do a treatment in Delhi in the hottest time of the year. I had been in Delhi in that same June for a short while. The temperature was 46 degrees Celsius and took a huge toll from every body, even more from a body that, since a couple of decades, was used to the cold climate at the height of above 3000 meters.
“Death called him to Delhi”, a sadhu neighbour of BC said and thus put any speculation that there might have been some foul play into a different perspective. “His time had come.”

BC’s sons came to Gangotri and took the translation of the Yoga Vashishtha out of his hut. Their father had given his life to this work. The ash of BC was immersed in his beloved Ganga Ma – in Haridwar, where he had started his sadhu life. The circle had come full round – an inspiring life had ended…
By Maria Wirth

link to buy the book presently for Rs 349 instead of 499
https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india-by-maria-wirth
also available on Padhega India
https://www.padhegaindia.in/product/thank-you-india-a-german-womans-journey-to-the-wisdom-of-yoga/
and also on amazon for Rs 440

my latest book in English July 2025 by Vitasta, “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left”

The post Insights from a VIP Sadhu in Gangotri first appeared on Maria Wirth.

The Issue of Conversion: Challenges before Hindu Society
Hindu’s Conversion to Abrahamic Religions

Abstract
The article examines the aggressive proselytization targeting Hindus in India, exposing the socio-political and cultural ramifications of conversions to Abrahamic religions. It highlights the lack of reliable data on conversions, despite documented cases of fraudulent tactics, including financial incentives, “miracle cures,” and exploitation of vulnerable communities. She contrasts Hinduism—an inclusive, philosophy-based tradition emphasizing dharma (righteousness) and universal spiritual truth—with the exclusive, dogmatic nature of Christianity and Islam, which claim sole religious legitimacy and threaten non-believers with eternal damnation. The article wonders why the secular Indian government is enabling religious inequalities, such as preferential treatment for “minority” religions and the marginalization of Hindu institutions. It is argued that conversions fracture social harmony, empower divisive forces, and erode India’s spiritual heritage. She calls for educating Hindus about their profound philosophical roots (e.g., Advaita Vedanta), challenging irrational dogmas of Christianity and Islam through rational discourse, and stopping unequal religious policies by the state. Ultimately, Wirth frames the preservation of Hinduism as essential not only for India’s cultural integrity but also for humanity as a whole. The Vedic knowledge that God is within as blissful consciousness (sat-chit-ananda) is lacking in the Abrahamic religions.

Text

Conversion is a big challenge for Hindu society in India. Yet it is hardly a topic of public debate. Moreover, it is impossible to get accurate data of conversions. In fact, even the data regarding the composition of the population religion wise, may not be reliable.

In 1947, India’s population was around 36.1 crores, of whom 30.37 crores (84.1%) were Hindus, 3.54 crore (9.8%) were Muslims, 0.83 crore (2.3%) were Christians and 0.27 crores (0.7%) Buddhists. (the figures are based on the census of 1951).
In the 2011 census, the Hindu population had shrunk by 4.3 percent and the Muslim population had grown by 4.4 percent. The overall population had tripled to 121.9 crores. Hindus accounted for 96.62 crore (79.8%), Muslims for 17.22 crore (14.23%), Christians for 2.78 crores (2.3%) and Buddhists for 0.84 crore (0.7%).
The census of 2021 was postponed due to the Covid pandemic and will be held only in 2026/27. It can be assumed that since 2011, the Hindu population has shrunk further, yet the population of Muslims is still cited to be 14 percent and that of Christians still 2 percent. Do we bury our heads ostrich-like in the sand?

According to the website censusofindia.net, in 2025, the overall population is estimated at 141 crores, of whom 114 crores are expected to be Hindus. This would be a slight increase of Hindus to 80 percent, which is unlikely considering the massive conversion attempts, apart from the lower Hindu birthrate. Unfortunately, I could not find official numbers for conversions. ChatGPT says: “I could not find any official government estimate that gives a precise number of Hindus who have converted to Christianity since 2011. In fact, the Government of India has explicitly said that no central record/database of religious conversion is maintained.”
The same is valid for Islam: “There is no reliable official data specifying how many Hindus have converted to Islam in India since 2011.” ChatGPT continued, “Most demographic surveys, including those by Pew Research Center, find that religious switching is very rare overall.” According to Pew research survey of 2021, 0.7 percent of the respondents said that they have changed their religion. This would come to around 6 million people. Yet since there is no central database of religious conversion, the true numbers are anybody’s guess.

Aggressive conversions are happening

Most of us know even from personal observation, that missionary activity is extremely high in India by both Christianity and Islam, especially in certain states like Punjab or Tamil Nadu, and basically everywhere, specifically in tribal areas. They don’t hide it. Christian publications exhort their members to convert Hindus. “India must be evangelised in this generation”, declared ‘Blessings’, a Christian youth magazine in its 2008 issue, which a priest from Tamil Nadu had left with me. And a German Catholic magazine, which landed in my mother’s mailbox, had an article with the ominous title, “India – a success story”.

The Joshua project is clearly implemented. New churches shoot up, Christian schools offer discount for fees for Christians, missionaries ‘visit’ patients in hospitals, etc. Occasionally, news about conversions come out in the media due to complaints by Hindus. Some examples from only one week:
On 30. September 2025, several news outlets reported that over 1000 Hindus from poor and backward castes converted to Christianity in Lucknow’s Mohanlalganj. A village once free of Christianity had now 5 churches and100 plus prayer halls. According to India Today, police unearthed a well-oiled nexus to lure Dalits with the help of ‘miracles cures’.
A few days later, another huge conversion ring with wide connections across states was uncovered in Gujarat’s Nandiad, on which OpInda reported.
Soon after, on 6. October, more concerning news surfaced. An American, James Watson, in India on a business visa, was arrested together with two Indian associates for fraudulent conversions in villages in Maharashtra, targeting especially children. He told them that ‘Hinduism is based on superstition. But if they convert, they will be happy, prosperous and cured from illness.’ In this connection, CNN News 18 reported that between 2018 and 2025 over 320 cases had been discovered of visa misuse for religious conversion. This may be only the tip of the iceberg.

Muslims, too, try hard to get Hindus into their fold.
The Chhangur Baba case shows, how much money flows into fraudulent, elaborate conversion efforts. He and his associates were arrested in July 2025. He received hundreds of crores from abroad for his conversion racket, where he funded Muslim men to entrap Hindu girls. Love Jihad, for long denied, can’t be denied any longer. Even otherwise, Muslims are taught to coax Hindus into converting by presenting Islam as far more attractive than Hinduism. Zakir Naik said in one of his speeches around 2016, it is easy for Muslims to convert Hindus. They only need to show Hindus a picture of Ganesha, with his elephant head and big belly, and ask them whether this is the God whom they worship.

This situation is concerning and the question, why the government has no database, is only natural. Even in states, which have enacted anti-conversion laws, and where it is obligatory to register a change of religion, no overall numbers are available. What is available, are FIRs filed for unlawful conversion, and individual notifications in government Gazettes about name changes. But how many conversions in toto happened, nobody seems knows.

Religion is not a concern for the government

Is it possible that the government does not WANT to know what is happening on the religious front? If this is true, then even the 2011 census may not give the correct picture. And from an anecdotical episode, this is indeed possible.
A teacher in Mumbai, who was part of the 2011 census team, told me that during the training for the census, they were instructed to accept whatever information they were given. She surveyed a heavily Muslim populated area and knew that she was not getting honest answers. She went back to her supervisor and told him, that the census won’t be accurate if they are not allowed to check the information, for example how many children a family has. Her instructor was blunt, “You heard the instruction. Accept whatever info is given.” She told me, “If the government manages to conduct an accurate census next time, it will be a shock for Hindus.”

When there is no will to know what is happening regarding conversions, there is probably also no will, to stop it. The government, rightfully, maintains that it is secular and not concerned about the religion of its subjects. It has a point. This is clearly a worldwide attitude. The German government also no longer records the religion of its citizens. It did so till in the 1950s, when I was in primary school and dutifully filled out “rk” for Roman Catholic in all official forms. Yet, today, only the Churches keep a record.

Hinduism and the Abrahamic religions are completely different categories

The situation in India is, however, unique. The Hindu faith of the majority is very different from Islam and Christianity. Often it is not even considered as a religion, because it does not have a rigid ‘belief system’, but it is rather a way of life. It has a solid foundation in philosophy and demands to follow dharma – to do the right thing in the given situation according to one’s conscience. It does not exclude anyone from being ‘allowed’ into the Presence of God. In fact, it claims, God is already present in everyone, and explains what is meant by ‘God” (not a kind of biased superman on a golden throne high up in the sky, but all-pervading, pure, blissful consciousness). In short, Hinduism makes a lot of sense.

Unlike Islam and Christianity, which were brought to India by invaders, Hinduism does not proselytise. Those two foreign religions demand blind belief in dogmas. A dogma is a claim that cannot be proven to be true, and the most irrational, and very harmful dogmas of both Islam and Christianity are the claims that, 1. Only their religion is true (both didn’t sort out over the centuries, which one exactly is true, because of course they don’t have any proof for their claims) and 2. if you don’t convert to Islam or Christianity, the great God will discard you at Judgement Day and let you burn ETERNALLY in hell.

Burden of history

Hindus were threatened and brutally coerced to convert first by Muslim and later by Christian invaders over several centuries. Millions of Hindus died for their faith. Many preferred humiliation and financial burden to conversion. When the outsiders left, Hinduism was still strong. However, most of those Hindus, who had converted to Islam and Christianity during foreign occupation, were successfully alienated from their original tradition especially during British rule, who were, and still are, masters in ‘divide and rule’. They made those converts believe that they were better, higher, more worthy than Hindus.

At Independence in 1947, Muslims demanded their own country to be carved out from India, called Pakistan, which in 1971 split into Pakistan and Bangladesh. So, one would expect that Islam is no longer a problem in India, and Hindus have only to deal with those who converted to Christianity but who also, like Muslims, believe that they alone have the true religion, and Hindus will be eternally damned by God if they don’t convert. Yet this is a wrong notion because many Muslims, who agitated for a separate state before Independence on the ground that they can’t live with Hindus, did not go to Pakistan. They stayed back, possibly even with the nefarious agenda to fulfil Allah’s alleged wish to make all Indians follow Islam. The truncated India was generous and allowed it, maybe on the advice of the British who wanted to sow the seeds for division in Independent India.

Many Hindus probably considered the Indian Muslims and Christians as not very different from themselves, and did not realise that their religious doctrine had meanwhile indoctrinated many of them to look down on Hindus, and they had become as unreasonable as their foreign masters used to be. Now the converts, too, believed that the great God/ Allah does not like Hindus and will throw them into eternal hellfire, and that Allah/God wants only Muslims/Christians on earth. No reasonable person would believe this, and Indians are generally reasonable, but due to indoctrination from childhood, many of the converts had embraced this irrational belief.

Respectable Gods and religions

Moreover, on the international stage, those religions, which consider the creator of this vast universe as personal, revengeful and biased, are considered respectable even today. People, who are otherwise reasonable, don’t realise that a God, who loves only certain people, must be a tribal God and cannot be the Source of All.

Unfortunately, Hindus did not seem to be aware of those dogmas. Otherwise, why would they allow Christian schools to continue after Independence to teach Hindu children, when ‘good’ Christian teachers naturally look down on their Hindu students because, according to the Church, they follow a ‘dark, demonic cult’?
Why would the government allow the catechism to be taught to Christian students, but not allow Vedanta philosophy, which is a rational explanation of what is true, to be taught – not even to Hindu students?
Why would the ‘minority religions’, parts of which are irrational and based entirely on blind belief, get government concessions, and Hindu Dharma, which is based on solid philosophy, would be disadvantaged, for example in the Right to Education Act or regarding their Places of Worship?

Indian Secularism is upside down

So, even though a secular state is not supposed to be interested in the religion of its subjects, in India, certain reforms would only be fair, as presently the stakes are stacked against Hindus. If a Hindu converts, he gets the advantage of belonging to a politically influential ‘minority’, which is worldwide even a majority. And if he happens to be a criminal, even world media will treat him more leniently than it treats Hindus, and it seems, as if this lenient treatment extends even to the judiciary worldwide.

Agreed, the government has no role to play in religion, but it surely has to level the playing field, especially since the Abrahamic religions and Hindu Dharma are in very different categories: Islam and Christianity are exclusive and divide society between those who are right and saved, and those who are wrong and damned. Even in the interest of developing a ‘rational mindset’, which is the explicit goal of education, the followers of those religions should not be given favours by the government.
In contrast, Hindu Dharma is inclusive and makes sense. It claims that ultimately all will reach back to their divine Source and it exhorts to follow Dharma. It would make sense, in the interest of a stable society, to favour it.

A harmonious society is rather impossible if the divisiveness of the dogmatic religions is not taken out

If you have many crores of Indians who despise Hindus because according to their belief, Hindus are great sinners by worshipping false Gods, a harmonious society is tough to achieve, and enemies of Bharat have a field day to instigate chaos and violence. This is not theory. It’s happening, including with big money from the Deep State, as the investigation into USAID had revealed.

Do Hindus even know what is preached in the innumerable churches and mosques across India? I know that Hindu Gods are called devils or demons by Christian clergy. Yet incredibly, Hindus don’t challenge those harmful dogmas of Christianity and Islam, even though they easily could, as they have the better arguments. Not only this: according to the Human Rights Charter of the United Nations, it is unacceptable to demean a group of people as inferior and damned for eternity. Yet strangely, when a religious doctrine demeans a billion people, moreover people, who are known to be open-minded and dharmic, nobody flags it as wrong.

It shows that the powers-that-be prefer that humans everywhere hold irrational beliefs instead of gaining deep insights into what is true and what can be experienced. It means, Hinduism is an obstacle for those powers. This is an important point and, in all likelihood, responsible for the unfair negative portrayal of Hinduism in world media and the entertainment industry and for funnelling money into conversion attempts. Yet the eradication of Hinduism is definitely not in the interest of humanity as a whole.

Blunders that need to be corrected

It was clearly a blunder that Hindus did not explain their faith to the Indian followers of the Abrahamic religions right after Independence and it needs to be corrected urgently. And an even greater blunder also needs to be corrected: Hindu pundits hardly explained the solid philosophical foundation of their faith even to their own people and especially to the younger generations.

Hindus are strongly focussed on education. Parents make great sacrifices to educate their children well. Yet they did not realise that under the garb of ‘modern’ education their offspring was not learning anything about their ancient tradition but instead, their children were weaned away from it – due to the immense influence of the Left, which is an arm of the infamous ‘Deep State’.

Young Hindus, who went through college education, no longer know the basics of their faith and have not even heard of the Brahman (Advaita Vedanta) that is their own inner essence. Many become atheists, without knowing what being an atheist actually means. In recent years, they become not only atheists, but also ‘woke’ and ‘sexually liberated’, whatever this means. This virus affects mainly the Hindu youth. Of course, not all Hindu youth, but many have no longer an anchor in their faith – a faith for which earlier generations even died. This negative influence makes them vulnerable to go against dharma, not to believe any longer in Karma, and it also makes them vulnerable for conversion, if they see material benefits.

It’s NO virtue not to propagate Hindu Dharma

Hindus sometimes even seem proud that they don’t propagate their faith. It is a false pride and not wise. Christianity and Islam are clever. They explain their good aspects, like strong belief and trust in God or Allah, and strong community support. They also explain why they are closer to the truth. The reason, they say is, that they have one God compared to many Gods in Hinduism. They are right: one source is closer to the truth. The Source must be formless and therefore only One. Unfortunately, most Hindus can’t counter them because, not only do their Muslim and Christian friends not know, but even they themselves don’t know any longer the basic insights of the Rishis – the one formless Brahman of the Vedas which is within all of us.

If the Hindu representatives had explained the basics of the Vedas right after Independence in a big way, many of those who had converted to Islam and Christianity might have come back. Anyone who has common sense will come to the conclusion that Hindu Dharma is superior to all three Abrahamic religions, as it is a genuine enquiry and not blind belief in the supremacy of a particular group.

Instead, in the name of ‘harmony’, Hindus downplayed the intellectual superiority of Hindu Dharma and allowed Islam and Christianity to aggressively propagate their religions as “only true” and lure Hindus with a simple formula: there is only one true God and our God is this true God. He is compassionate and loving and has promised that He will look after you, provided you accept him and keep the rules and commandments.
Another positive aspect is stressed: the convert is promised to be part of a strongly bonded brotherhood especially in the case of Islam, but also in the case of Christianity, he will get emotional and financial support from the Church if in distress. Apart from that, since for many Hindus this is not enough reason to forgo their tradition, they lure converts with financial benefits, cheat outright with so-called miracles or frighten simple-minded Hindus with eternal hellfire.

What are the solutions?

Very important is of course that the government does not favour the big and powerful ‘minorities’ of Muslims and Christians. How to achieve this change in a democracy, where everyone is focused mainly on vote banks, needs to be brainstormed.

Apart from the government, Hindu Society has a big role to play: First and foremost, the basics of Vedic wisdom need to be made known widely. Schools and Universities are a good start and thanks to the New Education Policy, the Indian Knowledge System (IKS) is now indeed taken into educational institutions. There is however a problem: even teachers often don’t know much about the profound philosophy and haven’t done sadhana in their life to discover Atma within. So, they prefer to explain festivals or customs or stories from the Ramayana or Bhagavad Gita.
All this is important, but if the greatest advantage of Hindu Dharma is not clearly explained, students may not be convinced why they should stick to their tradition, especially when they are lured with material benefits and also told that billion humans worldwide see merit in those dogmatic religions. Otherwise, why would there be so many Christians and Muslims in the world?

The most important point and the crucial difference between Hindu Dharma and the Abrahamic religions is that Hindus claim that God is within as Sat-Chit-Ananda (blissful Consciousness), and that it can be experienced.

To convey this knowledge effectively, it would need Hindus who have touched their Atma, who know from experience about the oneness of all, because if the truth is conveyed only theoretically, it won’t make an impact. Therefore, sadhana needs to be encouraged and sadhana needs to be the criterion for being able to teach, not academic degrees. Small booklets with sayings of genuine saints like Anandamanyi Ma or Mata Amritanandamayi could be distributed in a big way. They are already available and explain Vedanta philosophy in a simple way. For me personally, meeting Anandamayi Ma had a decisive influence in understanding Vedic wisdom. It was easy to understand because she lived this oneness. Anandamayi Ma once said, “There is no difference between you and me and I don’t see a difference.”

Approach to Indian Christians

The theology of Christianity is a little confusing. On the one hand, it is considered heresy for a Christian to claim that he is one with God, yet on the other hand, the Holy Spirit is supposed to come over him and guide him. And all three – God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit – are seen as God. Nowadays, many Christians in the West no longer accept the dogmas of the Church, but take the sayings of Jesus and Bhakti as guideline. Therefore, many even claim that God is within, as Jesus himself said “the Kingdom of heaven is within”.

Hindus should point out to Christians those aspects, where Jesus, in contrast to the Church, is in line with the Indian Rishis. For example, he made the Upanishadic statement, “I and my Father are one” (Aham Brahmasmi). Unfortunately, and shrewdly, the Church declared that this claim is valid only for Jesus, but this of course doesn’t make sense.

Another point: When once asked what is the most important commandment, Jesus said, that the most important commandment is to love God above everything else. This teaching is recorded in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It means, Jesus was foremost advocating Bhakti, the most important path also for Hindus, and for anyone who wants to realise the truth. Yet the Church declared as its first commandment: ‘you shall not have other gods before me’, and doesn’t mention the Bhakti aspect.
Now in all likelihood, the Christians will counter Hindus and claim, “What the Church means, is that we need to worship the true God, and we, the Christians, have the true God and you, Hindus, have false Gods.”

It needs to be understood first by Hindus themselves and then also conveyed to Indian Christians: Hinduism claims that there is absolute truth, and relative truth. Absolute truth is that which is really true, it means it must be always and self-evident. It means, only God (pure, eternal, unchanging Consciousness = Brahman) is really true (it can be logically concluded and experienced). And that Consciousness is really the only true, invisible, formless God. All else is Maya, a temporary appearance on this truth. This is of course universally valid and independent by what name one calls that one Truth.

An analogy makes it clear: in a movie hall, the flickering, changing pictures of the movie cover the movie screen. Yet the invisible white screen is the only real thing in the movie, all else, including the people, houses, etc. are temporary appearances whose substance is the one screen. The story of the movie is more like virtual reality. This should make sense nowadays. Even Elon Musk believes that this apparent reality is not the real thing. It follows naturally, that discovering the ‘real thing’ (Brahman) is the goal of life.
The Abrahamic religions do not have this absolute Truth level. Even their great (good) God and its opposite, the (evil) Satan, are within Maya, more in tune with the Devas and Asuras/Rakshasas of Hinduism.

We should use the sayings of Jesus which are in tune with Vedanta, to make Indian Christians reflect that the dogmas of the Church are unnecessary and even ridiculous, and that their accusation that Hindus worship false Gods does not apply, simply because only one ‘thing’ (not a thing of course) is true and everything is contained in that.

Another point: Often, ordinary Christians are critical of their priests and bishops. I know this from Germany, and it may be the case also in India. Especially the higher clergy may be corrupt – morally and financially. If caught, such news should be spread. It helps to wean away common Christians from the Church.

Approach to Indian Muslims

The previous point that often, the clergy is not living an ideal, but rather an immoral life, is valid also for certain Muslim clergy. It should not be hushed up, but spread in news. It helps ordinary Muslims not to be too much under their sway.

It is probably more difficult to have a sensible dialogue with Muslims. Some Britisher made a valid observation: “While the Hindus sharpen their arguments, the Muslims sharpen their swords.” At present, there is the unfortunate situation, that Muslims are confident that Hindus are afraid of their street power. This needs to change and Muslims need to be afraid that they will pay for instigating violence. Law enforcement agencies need to make them pay, or even Hindus who are not afraid to push them back in street violence.

Yet there are also other means, to make Indian Muslims understand that going against Hindus is not in their own interest. One important point is to make them realise that they are useful tools (idiots) to create chaos which is in the interest of the Deep State (DS). The global financial system, spearheaded by mainly Jewish banker billionaires, is very powerful in the DS. At present, there is a lot of debate in the American society about who actually controls the US government and its foreign policy.
The release of 3 million pages of the Epstein Files in February 2026 has opened a Pandora’s box. For the first time, common people gain insights into the secret, dark practices of the so-called top global elite which seems more like a Satanic cult.

It may sound like a conspiracy theory, but attempts are clearly on to propel humanity into a controlled one world government with the help of surveyance technology. The World Economic Forum openly said that ‘creative destruction’ is needed for the ‘Great Reset’ to occur. The fact that Muslims are convenient tools for the DS to destroy societies, has become especially obvious in Europe. Incidentally, Jewish organisations are instrumental in bringing the Muslim ‘refugees’, mainly young men, into Europe. Why? To destroy nation states by intermingling the races.

It should also be clear to Indian Muslims that Taliban and even ISIS were bankrolled by the CIA and other organisations of the deep state, and that obviously, some of their Muslim leaders are corrupt. On the surface, Muslims and Jews are portrayed as the biggest enemies, yet both religions have a lot in common. However, the really big money, which influences geopolitics in a big way, is not with the Muslims.

There is another worrying aspect, which should also worry Indian Muslims: there is a Jewish prophecy that before the messiah comes, a huge war needs to happen (the war of Gog and Magog) where the majority of humans will perish. Presently in geopolitics, Israel is clearly pushing for a big war, and they openly said, if pushed to a corner, they would use their nuclear weapons.

If Indian Muslims would understand that certain Muslim leaders make deals with the western DS (like in Syria recently or in Bangladesh), and that they will ultimately not get their worldwide caliphate but end up being controlled by the more powerful global financial system which has literally ‘all the money of the world’, they might align themselves with the overall interest of India and not weaken India by going against Hindus. Ex-Muslims can play a big role in making Muslims aware of the geopolitical situation and also in making them doubt the irrational dogmas. Their numbers of ex-Muslims are increasing even in India.

Once I heard a congress spokesperson say on TV, “what does it matter if one worships Krishna or Christ.” True, it doesn’t matter much, Bhakti is a valid path and all true devotion and prayers reach the One. This is valid for Hindus, Christians and Muslims. But it matters what else those religions demand to believe blindly (for example that Hindus are worshipping demons and will go to hell), and which not only creates discord in the society, but also harms those believers individually, as they don’t follow their conscience which tells them to do the right thing in the given circumstances, but instead blindly “believe absurdities which can make them commit atrocities”, as Voltaire had already observed.

So, first, Hindus themselves need to be solidly grounded in their ancient wisdom through knowledge and sadhana, and second, the unreasonable dogmas of Islam and Christianity need to be fearlessly challenged – possibly even by taking the issue to international bodies like the United Nations.

By Maria Wirth
if you like my writing, consider reading my books
Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left – July 2025

Why Hindi Dharma is under attack is now also available in Hindi
https://www.amazon.in/Hindu-Muslimon-Isaiyon-Vampanthion-Aakrman/dp/9391154832

Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of Yoga, Nov 2018 (from a personal angle)

The post The Issue of Conversion: Challenges before Hindu Society first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Here is the interview, originally published on newsgram:

Maria Wirth is a writer and author originally from Germany. She studied psychology at Hamburg University and worked with Lufthansa in her early years, which allowed her to travel across many countries, from Chile to Indonesia. In 1980, Maria came to India for what was meant to be a short stopover on her way to Australia. However, her life changed when she experienced India’s spiritual traditions. Deeply inspired, she decided to stay and spent many years living a simple life in ashrams and spiritual communities.
In this interview with Varsha Pant, Wirth speaks about her new book ‘Why Hindu Dharma Is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians, and the Left’ and also shares her views on Indian spirituality, the concept of Hindutva, Problems with Islam, and the future of Hinduism. The conversation went as follows:

Q
Please tell us about yourself and your personal spiritual journey, from Christianity to Indian philosophy and Hinduism. What was it about Hinduism that fascinated you so deeply that you decided to stay in India? Also, in your view, what is the true definition of Hinduism, and how is it different from the way it is commonly understood today?

A
Well, I always had questions when I was a teenager. I always wanted to know “What is life meant for?”. And I couldn’t get answers. I used to discuss with the priest in religious class, and I just couldn’t get answers. I lost my faith in Christianity because I couldn’t believe that God could send somebody eternally to hell. Hell made a big impression on me as a child. But I felt there must be a great power. So I never really lost my faith in God, if you want to call it God. So when I came to India, suddenly everything made so much sense, because here it is explained.

As a Christian also, I was talking to God within. But God was supposed to be somewhere above the clouds in heaven, and I could never understand how that works. In India, suddenly I hear: “Bhagwan is inside in the form of consciousness.” This made a lot of sense and impressed me so much because, if you think about it, what is the most important thing in our life? I mentioned it also in my book: Imagine God, or a king, says to you, ‘You can have everything you want. I will give you everything. Just tell me your wishes. But there is one condition: you won’t be conscious.’ Would you accept? Would you accept a big house, a beautiful husband, all the money, all the high positions, if you are not conscious?
We never think about this. We take consciousness for granted. And by consciousness, I mean what makes thinking possible. It is the basis of the mind. When I heard about Advaita Vedanta, the Indian philosophy, it immediately made sense. It was like, wow! I was so happy. Suddenly, I didn’t have questions anymore about the meaning of life or about what is important. I felt that if this consciousness is my essence, then I should find out who I really am. “Who am I?” is the most important question in Hindu Dharma.

Indian philosophy impressed me so much, and that’s why I write, because I feel that in the West, this knowledge is lacking. And now, I feel that even in India, especially among youngsters, many don’t know about it anymore. They are not aware what great treasure they have. You don’t even have to study much. Just reflect a little on what is true—what is true about myself. Nowadays, we don’t do this, because of our mobiles. We are always looking outside, and it has become much more difficult to look inside.
When I came to India, I used to sit for one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening for meditation. Now, I have to admit, I don’t do it anymore. So much information is coming in. I want to know about the situation in the world, and it is important to know about current events. But it is most important that we know what our essence is. If we have this anchor, then we can be interested in what is happening, things like the Epstein files and so on. The world is in a bad shape nowadays. We should be aware of it, but we should not forget the most important connection, which is with our true Self—Bhagwan, Brahman, Ishvara, God, whatever you want to call it. Names don’t matter.

Have you heard of this concept of Brahman earlier? Did you know about it? I met some students at a conference a few years ago. During tea break, I asked them, ‘Can you explain what Hinduism is about?’ One girl said, ‘We worship many gods.’ I asked, ‘And who created the many gods?’ There was silence. Then I asked, ‘Have you ever heard of Brahman? I don’t mean Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva—the Creator, Sustainer, and Destroyer—the trinity, but the all-encompassing Brahman’. Nobody had heard about it. I was so shocked. It is YOUR (Indian) knowledge.

In the West, many philosophers benefited from this knowledge. Now nobody mentions it. I feel what is happening is that they want to control us. For that, we have to lose our connection to God, to Bhagwan. Then we can be controlled. Then we are afraid to die, and we do everything for security. That is not a good state. So, the main thing is that we have to find this inner connection. Then life becomes easier. It will not always be easy—difficult times will come—but you have an anchor. I recently talked with some German friends, and we all agreed that we are very grateful to India for this knowledge. Unfortunately, many young Indians and even old Indians don’t know about it anymore.

I think it is easier for Indians to understand Advaita Vedanta. I was once in an ashram in Telangana or Andhra Pradesh, very far off, at the end of the road near the mountains. It was the ashram of Karunamayi. A bus came with villagers, and I was the only foreigner there. The children ran up the steps, saw me, and ran back to their mothers because they probably had never seen a foreigner. Karunamayi came to the temple and gave a talk in Kannada. I don’t understand Kannada, but I understood one sentence.

She said the temple was for Lalita—Lalita Ambika, Devi, Shakti. The innate female power in Brahman that creates everything. She said, ‘Lalita Chaitanya Rupa’—Lalita is in the form of consciousness. At that moment, I thought, if you tell this to Westerners, even ones with a PhD, they will be confused: ‘What does it mean that God is in the form of consciousness?’ But I felt the villagers understood it. Maybe Indians who go through the English education system are more like Westerners and actually are at a disadvantage.
The problem with Islam is that in the scripture, in the Quran, there are many verses which are very much against others, against those who are not Muslims. It says Allah will accept only Muslims. If you are not Muslim, then you will not be accepted. So when someone is a Muslim and hears this, and thinks that Allah wants only Muslims on Earth, then of course he may not be nice to others.
Maria Wirth on Islam

As a Christian, I felt God within, but couldn’t understand Him as distant in heaven. In India, I learned that God lives inside us as consciousness.

Q
In your book, you mention how the concepts of Hinduism and Hindutva are often misunderstood—where Hinduism is seen as “good” while Hindutva is portrayed as “bad.” How has this distinction come about, and what are the main reasons behind this perception? Why do you think both these concepts are widely attacked or misunderstood today?

A
I don’t see any difference between Hinduism and Hindutva. The British coined Hinduism, which is actually not correct, because an -ism usually means a dogma. Communism and socialism, it is always about a dogma. Hinduism is not dogmatic. It is very open. So ‘Hindutva’ (Hindu-ness) is a better word than ‘Hinduism.’

What I noticed, and my book is also about this—the title is ‘Why Hindu Dharma Is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians, and the Left’—is that the attacks became stronger after Hindus became aware that actually, Hinduism and Hindutva are good. Missionaries told Indians, ‘You have a very primitive religion. You worship nature and many gods. You should adopt Christianity.’ Then, around the year 2000, when the internet became stronger, there was a talk about Internet Hindu. Hindus could suddenly connect and say, ‘Actually, we have a very good philosophy, a very good tradition with so much knowledge. We can be proud of it.’

When this movement came up, suddenly people started saying, ‘These Hindutvavadis are bad people. They want to throw out Muslims and Christians.’ Nothing of the sort! Hindutva means Hindu-ness, and the essence of Hindu Dharma is that this consciousness—Bhagwan, God—is in everyone. Absolutely in everyone, whether you are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, or anything else. It doesn’t matter. It is most inclusive. I did not understand why those ‘Internet Hindus’ were so badly attacked. Even I was personally attacked.
My neighbor was a communist from West Bengal. He had a Brahmin name. He used to introduce me to his friends as ‘the local RSS pracharak’ and it sounded like a smear. I didn’t know what RSS was then, but I thought it must be good, if it agrees with my views. People try to make it look bad, as if RSS is against others. This is a misunderstanding. Not only a misunderstanding, but a conscious one. They don’t want to know the truth. They want to attack Hindu Dharma because, if Christians or Muslims really became aware of what great knowledge is here, they would at least become half Hindu. It makes much more sense—respecting rishis, respecting life, ideally not eating animals. I find vegetarianism very important. We are so insensitive when we think we can kill animals just for taste.

People say, ‘Everyone has free choice.’ But you don’t have free choice if it affects the life of another being. Animals are also beings. And this needs to be discussed, and actually in the west there are now discussions about it. But unfortunately, in India more and more people started eating meat. If it’s necessary, like in cold areas, it is okay, but if there is no need for it, why kill? This respect for human life, animal life, and nature is a very beautiful aspect of Hinduism, Hindutva.

For 20 years, I lived mainly in ashrams. I thought every Indian knew what great treasure they had. Then I came into a normal environment and realized that many people were very negative about Hinduism. Most of them were English-speaking and had gone through the education system. They had been taught to look down on their own tradition. I had not realised this earlier because when I came to India I thought ‘wow, what great knowledge is here’. Recently, a CIA document, declassified in 2016, talked about cultural trends in India. It said that apart from village worship, Hinduism has a very sophisticated philosophical and ethical system in Vedanta, in the Upanishads. The deep state know this. So why don’t they research and spread it? Instead, they attack it. I feel the reason is that they want to cut us off from our connection with the divine. That is the main purpose.

If you see what is happening in the world now, the top ‘elites’ around Epstein are very depraved. It is very bad. It is Kali yuga. But that doesn’t mean we have to fall into depression. We should stand up for what is true and for a dharmic life. So, feel proud to be a Hindu. Some people feel ‘Hindu’ is not a good word and call themselves ‘Sanatani.’ But we should be careful. ‘Sanatani’ sounds very close to ‘satanic’. Westerners don’t know what ‘Sanatani’ means. They may automatically think of ‘satanic.’ Not because they want to insult us, but because that is the word they know. So, we should be careful not to give anyone a handle to call us satanic, demonic. In India, it is no problem. But internationally, people sometimes say, Hindus worship demons. Some Christian priests and podcasters say this. But it is completely wrong. Hindu Dharma is the very opposite of satanic.

Q
Why do you think many people from other religions find it difficult to understand or accept Hinduism? Could you explain some of the common myths and misunderstandings about Hinduism today, especially regarding idol worship?

A
In Hindu Dharma, there are basically two levels. There is one level of “Advaita” which means not two, it is the one consciousness which is permeating everything and encompassing everything. It is Brahman, or Ishvara, or Paramatman, or Tat. It doesn’t matter what name you give it. The Vedas say it cannot be put into words, but it really exists. I often use an analogy given by Ramana Maharshi. He used to live in Tiruvannamalai and left his body in 1950. He gave a very nice analogy. He said, imagine a screen in a movie hall. A white screen, nothing on it.

Now the movie is projected. You see so many people, houses, so many things moving on the screen, yet the screen is now hidden. But if you touch any person or object in the movie, you touch only the screen. The essence of everything, including us, is the screen, that is real and solid. The movie is just a flicker. It comes and goes. So Hindu Dharma says there are two aspects. One is the screen—Brahman. It is true, eternal, one, with no distinction, hidden under the movie. And then you have Maya. In Maya, everything is temporary. It appears real, but is not really real. The analogy is not perfect, because in the case of Brahman and Maya, Brahman itself creates the movie or Maya. There is no projector from outside. The screen itself creates the movie with the help of Shakti. So, these two levels of absolute truth and relative truth, we should keep in mind.

In Maya, there are not only human beings. There are also Devas, Asuras, and Rakshasas. In Hindu Dharma, Devas are worshipped. Not asuras and rakshasas. The temples are for Devas. Devas stand for sattva, purity. Asura stands for rajas, ego and Rakshasas for tamas, ignorance, darkness. Even the trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are Devas. They are not eternal. Only Brahman is eternal. But they live very long and have much more power than humans. There are also other beings like the saptah rishis and many others are mentioned in the Puranas.

I think we should take the existence of other beings seriously. Human perception is very limited. We see only a small bandwidth of what is really there. Hindus have been in touch with the devas and rightly worship them, because they are helpful in Maya—Surya for example, Chandra (moon) and the elements. India was very far-sighted. You knew about the five elements, but how did you know about them? You knew about the constellations in the sky, but how did you know about them? You also had a long history with great spiritual personalities or Avatars, like Krishna and Rama.

When you worship Devas, Christians, Muslims, and Jews say, ‘Oh, they worship other gods.’ They don’t realise that the God they worship is on the level of Devas, because they don’t have this eternal level in their understanding. They see only God in heaven, watching us, and Satan trying to tempt us, so, it’s all in maya only. Their whole religion is about believing in a story. They don’t consider what makes thinking possible. They [Followers of Abrahamic Faiths] think, ‘You worship Krishna, Rama, Ganesh, Shiva, Surya—so many forms. How can that be right? There is only one God.’ In one sense, they are right. There is only one God, one ultimate source. But Hindus also believe that or rather discovered that. Hindus postulate one God/ Brahman as essence of everything. Brahman contains everything—the Devas and everything what appears in the movie on the screen.

If we could explain this well, I think people from Abrahamic religions would understand. How can you say, ‘Only if you get baptized, you will be saved,’ or ‘Only if you become Muslim, you will be saved’? That doesn’t make sense. It is not possible. It doesn’t seem right.

Q
You have been outspoken about your criticism of Islam and the concept of jihad, and you have discussed these views in your book. How do you view Islam as a religion and the ideas behind it? What, in your opinion, leads to intolerance or violence in its interpretation?

A
The problem with Islam is, that in the scripture, in the Quran, there are many verses which are very much against others, against those who are not Muslims. It says Allah will accept only Muslims. If you are not Muslim, then you will not be accepted. So when someone is a Muslim and hears this, and thinks that Allah wants only Muslims on Earth, then of course he may not be nice to others. If he believes that God doesn’t like us, then naturally he may think he can also be bad to us, cheat us, or not be nice to us. If someone strongly believes what is written in the book, this can happen.

But there are many people who have never even read the Quran and who are just normal human beings. They have a conscience. They know that you don’t kill other people, you don’t cheat other people. This is ingrained in human nature. But if somebody is very much indoctrinated, then he will put his conscience aside and say, ‘Yes, let’s do jihad,’ “let’s do Allah’s will.” And this is very dangerous.

Recently, with all these Epstein files and what else is coming out about the deep state, and about ISIS and Al-Qaeda, I am coming more and more to the conclusion that Muslims are most likely instigated to riot and do jihad. Their leaders may be paid. See what happened in Bangladesh—it is terrible. I wonder what this deep state is doing, pushing people to fight each other. Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Left and Right—worldwide, they want us to fight each other. And I am coming more and more to the conclusion that we have to try to find commonalities among us common people and be aware of who is actually controlling us, who really has the power and all the money in the world.

I know Muslims can be dangerous. When clerics say, ‘It is written in the book, it is God’s word, you cannot change it.’ Then followers may think, ‘We have to get rid of all these Hindus.’ That is wrong. There is also a theory that Islam was originally created to get rid of Christianity. When Islam began, they went to Syria and killed the Christians there and then to North Africa, even Spain, and then to India. Some people say it was created to make us fight among each other. I don’t know if that is true but it is possible.

But look, for 2,000 years, people have been claiming, ‘God loves only us’—Christians, Muslims, Jews. How can that be true? Why has nobody said, ‘This is nonsense’? Can’t we stop this? Can’t we all be friends? Can’t we just be normal human beings? Why indoctrinate our minds with ‘God wants this, God wants that,’ when it makes no sense? I don’t think God wants us to kill each other. If we could make people understand this, it would be great for humanity.

Q
You have mentioned the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). What are your views on the role of the RSS in Indian society? Also, how do you see the Ghar Wapsi movement?

A
I find the Ghar Wapsi movement very important. The problem is that I know from my own experience, growing up in Germany as a Christian, that we were taught in school that our ancestors were very primitive. That they used to think that God was angry, when there was a thunderstorm, etc. So the teacher and the priest would tell us, ‘Look, now you are so lucky. Now you have the true God. But your ancestors were very primitive.’ The problem is now that Indian Christians and Indian Muslims, in all likelihood, were also taught a similar thing. ‘You know, these Hindus—you can forget about them. They are just so primitive. They worship so many gods and even strange gods.’

I think at the same time, there are always people who have the capacity to reflect. And if a certain number of such people would reflect and say, ‘Yes, Vedanta makes sense.’ Truth is like the screen in a movie. Brahman is eternal, always one, and we are now in this virtual reality or Maya. Elon Musk also talks about our reality being like virtual reality and not the real truth. So, I feel we have to make people understand. That’s why I said in my book that a misunderstanding killed millions of Hindus – the misunderstanding is that Hindus worship other gods. Worshipping other Gods besides the ‘true God’ is considered as the worst sin in Abrahamic religions. They don’t understand that the Devas within Maya are all in essence only the ONE Brahman.

Yahweh, God, Allah— all three demand, ‘worship only me.’ It means they acknowledge that there are other gods. They are within Maya. This is not rational and not helpful for humanity as a whole. That’s why I keep saying that Hindu Dharma is the best option for humanity, because it includes everybody.
They [Followers of Abrahamic Faiths] think, ‘You worship Krishna, Rama, Ganesh, Shiva, Surya—so many forms. How can that be right? There is only one God.’ In one sense, they are right. There is only one God. But Hindus also believe that. Hindus have one God/ Brahman an the essence of everything. Brahman contains everything—the devas and whatever else appears in the movie(Maya), including our persons.
Maria Wirth on polytheism

Q
You explained the concepts of Brahman and Maya, where Brahman is the ultimate reality and everything that happens appears on the “white screen” of consciousness. If all existence is part of the same truth, then what is the need for communal hatred or violence?

A
Exactly. There’s no need for this. I think people want us to fight against each other, so that we don’t look at who or what is manipulating and trying to control us. And also, that we forget about our connection to God within. We are working on computers, earning a little money, paying our bills, and trying to look after our families. And then there are these people who have billions—trillions we cannot even imagine—who seem to be more like the asuras of the Puranas, who don’t have the wellbeing of humanity at heart.

These asura-type persons want us to keep fighting. We should not fall into the trap. It’s important to follow Dharma and call for the help of the Devas – and never forget our connection to the screen, by whatever name we call it. Actually, nama-japa is a powerful means to keep in touch.

Q
On that note, do you think dharma truly prevails in India today? Do you believe that Hindu people in India are genuinely following dharmic values in their actions and decisions?

A
Well attempts are on disconnect Indians from Dharma—like this wokeism. Especially Hindu youth are in danger from foreign forces, which push wokeism, and LGBT, atheism, as they want to be ‘modern’. Now people go to the mall. Earlier, they would go for bhajans. But now, bhajan is coming back, I hear, and this is a good thing. I heard about bhajan clubbing, where people don’t go for heavy music but devotional music.

Even in Germany, bhajan is becoming popular. So I think people long to have a connection with God, with Bhagwan. If we don’t have it, we lack something. Then we have to look for something else. We need entertainment, we always have to do something. I wish Indians would still have this knowledge, and I think there are still many people who have special powers, like sadhus. India is a special country because the pursuit of truth is still very prominent.

In the West, there is no universal truth now. ‘Everybody has his own truth’, people there claim. We are very much lost in the West. India is still much better, but attempts are very strong to push Indians away from their traditions and from this connection.

Q
India is often described as a global spiritual center, yet spirituality seems to be declining in everyday life today. Why do you think this is happening? Also, do you think many people in India who are poor and are struggling have the time to think about spirituality?

A
I had a help. She was cooking for me every second day—dal—because I’m too lazy to cook dal, and dal is important when you don’t eat meat. So once she was telling me that nowadays people don’t know any longer that what they do has an effect on themselves. That is a very deep knowledge about karma. This knowledge is still ingrained in many Indians. And look, when you go to a pilgrimage place, you don’t have to worry. You can leave your bag, even if people are poor. This knowledge—that you should be a decent human being—is still here because people still know there is a Bhagwan. Trust in Him is still there.

In the West, there is a historian from Israel who is very famous. He is at the World Economic Forum. He was even here on TV, I think on India Today, and was presented as a very prominent historian. He says it is ridiculous to believe in God or a soul. He is important in the World Economic Forum, so you can see what they want us to believe. And it is wrong. He is wrong. Maybe some people think, ‘Oh, he’s so famous, he must be right.’ But he’s wrong.

Many people say India is very poor, but India is not so poor. Look at what you can buy for your money. If you have a salary of ₹60,000, that equals about €2,000 or €3,000 in Germany—that is ₹2 lakh or ₹3 lakh. So when we say poor, it is relative. Life is much easier in the sense that it is full of festivities. There is so much decoration, colourful lights, beautiful music, whether it is a religious festival or not. There is so much joy. Imagine small children growing up in this joyful atmosphere.

In the West, we have done away with everything. We basically have no festivals. This liveliness is missing. In India, there are bhajans, pilgrimage places, and beautiful temples. Everybody can go out and buy a small snack on the roadside. Most people can afford it because it is not expensive. In the West, everything is expensive. So when people keep saying India is such a poor country, I don’t agree. It is not only about GDP. If we want a higher GDP, everything has to become more expensive.

Q
India faces many serious challenges today, including corruption, crime, pollution, and national security concerns. In light of these issues, do you think India can truly become a Vishwaguru (a global spiritual and moral leader)?

A
India should be the Vishwa Guru because it has the knowledge – the knowledge that everything is contained in pure Consciousness, everything is included. And we are all the same in essence. We are not the same outwardly. We have different paths, everybody. We have different talents. You cannot say everybody is the same in this Maya. But our essence is the same. That means you respect everybody. So, the knowledge for being the Vishwa Guru is here. But I think, asuric/ adharmic forces want to disconnect us from Dharma and from this knowledge, so that we can also be easily controlled. I hope they won’t be successful. We should explain in a very simple and easy way what knowledge is here which is lacking elsewhere. Like I was so impressed when I first heard about this deep knowledge, others many also be impressed.

Q
In your book, you have mentioned several spiritual leaders who have inspired you in India. You also describe a special instance when you were deeply impressed by Dhirendra Krishna Shastri (Bageshwar Baba). Could you share that experience with us?

A
It was strange because I was flying back from Khajuraho to Delhi. I had not heard of Bageshwar Baba. There was a young swami walking with us to the plane—it was a small airport. One woman told me, ‘My God, we are so lucky. He is coming with us, flying with us. So many people want to see him.’ And I didn’t know who he was. When we landed, people were standing around him, very close. I took a photo of him.

Afterwards, when he went to Bihar, I realised, my God, millions come to see him. I feel, that he has the power to see things that are not easily seen. Some people say it is all fake and that he is cheating, but I don’t think he is cheating. I am convinced that psychic powers are possible, definitely. He also says very clearly that India is a Hindu Rashtra, which many Hindus appreciate. He says people should be proud to be Hindu and not convert for whatever reason. He is young, and so many youngsters come to him. I feel his influence is a very good thing.

Q
There have been many controversies surrounding Dhirendra Krishna Shastri and his views on women. What is your perspective on these debates? Additionally, what are your views on modern feminism and how it has moved away from its original purpose? In your opinion, what is missing in today’s gender equality movement?

A
It was in 2024, that I saw him. I have not followed what he has been saying in the last two years. So I don’t really know what he says.
But regarding feminism, I feel it went too far. When I was young, feminism started in Germany. I was not happy with it because some feminists wanted women to go to the army. I didn’t want to go to the army. In Germany at that time, we had mandatory military service for boys for 18 months. And the feminists wanted women also to go.

I think feminism has now gone too far. In a relationship, somebody has to give in. I remember discussions when we were young: suppose, the husband gets a transfer to another city, why should the wife go with him? The wife has her friends here, so why should she go? But somebody has to give in. If you start fighting from the start, then better don’t marry. Be alone.

I was recently at a girls’ college, and a police officer was talking about how girls should be careful. He said they should not expose themselves. Then a girl asked, ‘Why only girls? Why don’t you tell boys?’ And he said, ‘We tell the boys also.’ But her attitude was, ‘Why should I not wear whatever I like?’

When I see girls in miniskirts, I feel they would be much more comfortable in a salwar. They could move more easily. There should be some common sense, instead of just following the West. West is not the best. In the West, we have gone into a wrong direction. Now, when you see drag queens and people saying they are dogs and behave like dogs… when you follow what is happening in the West, it is bad—very unreasonable. I would not want India to go in the same direction.

Regarding men and women— sometimes giving in is not a bad quality. Unfortunately, this is not what is recommended. When I mentioned earlier, they want us to fight each other – ‘men and women’ also should be added. Laws which favour exclusively women and don’t even listen to the men’s arguments are in my view not fair. Such laws can be easily misused.

An example:
A taxi driver once told me that he picked up a woman in Delhi when he was returning empty to Uttarakhand. She got quickly into the car and said, ‘Straight, straight.’ He said, ‘Tell me where you want to go. Otherwise, I will drop you here.’ Then she said, ‘Okay, you can drop me, but only if you give me ₹300.’ He was shocked. He said he would call the police. Then she said, ‘I will tell the police what you did to me.’ He knew the police would believe her, so he felt trapped. He gave her ₹300 and she left.
It should not be like this. It is a very sad situation. Thinking, ‘Because the law is on my side, I can do whatever I want,’ is wrong.

Q
We have discussed many important issues—from the true essence of Hinduism to Hindutva, feminism, and your views on Islam and Christianity. In light of all this, what do you think is the future of Hinduism in India? How can Hindus preserve and strengthen their spiritual and cultural heritage in the coming years?

A
Well, the most important thing is that we do some sadhana. To sometimes stop and try to recover this inner essence, and develop love for it. It is about Jnana, Bhakti, Karma, and Dhyana, meditation. Meditation means sometimes going inside. This is most important—that we have some experience. Yes, there is a beautiful state within us. It is love. It is an expansion. Sometimes, when you wake up in the morning, when you are not yet fully you, when you don’t think yet, and you just feel, you get an inkling maybe, what that state is. I really think it is love. Somebody once said, “The only real thing is limitless love, and this is the screen.” Brahman.

It is in all of us, but it is hidden. In this play of Maya, they try to put it away, but it cannot be erased. I think that is what is meant by Satyameva Jayate. This screen cannot be deleted. It is always present, and we have to uncover it—discover our essence.

For the future of Hinduism, the main thing is that Hindus first need to do sadhana. They need to discover their essence. Do some meditation, do some yoga, read books like Bhagavad Gita and do nama-japa. And then also explain this wisdom to others—that we are not idol worshippers in their sense, that we are not sinners. What we are doing makes great sense. The god of the Abrahamic religions is basically a tribal god. If a god loves only one group, he must be a tribal god. He cannot be the universal God, isn’t it?

That is why I feel India has to become the Jagat Guru, because India has this inclusiveness. It is for everyone. It is not exclusivist. It does not say, “If you don’t follow this guru, this son of God, or this prophet, then sorry you go to hell.” We should be capable of making people understand that this is really nonsense—ridiculous.

We have to say it. Somehow we are shy to talk about religion. But it is not insulting; it is putting facts on the table. A Christian or Muslim has no problem saying, “You go to hell if you don’t convert.” That doesn’t make sense, isn’t it? Yet we don’t counter. We avoid a debate. But we should have the confidence to come and explain in a friendly way—not confrontational.

We should say: You are human first, no? It is possible that what you believe is the truth? And then explain what you have found. So, I think in this way, in Hinduism, we must first do our own sadhana. We have to know and experience this essence in us— know a little about the wisdom, too, but most important, feel the beauty and love inside. And then we can also explain it to others.

NewsGram thanks Maria Wirth for her time and insight.
Check out her new book “Hindu Dharma Is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians, and the Left” on amazon
https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 it is also available in Kindle version and also abroad under amazon.com or local amazons. at present there is a big discount. it is only Rs 315.

The post Interview by newsgram on my book first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Then, a few weeks ago, the founder of Vitasta Publishing asked me to be on a panel for the book release of “Democracy with Dharma” by Salvatore Babones. For the first time, I reflected on democracy a little deeper, and came to unexpected conclusions.

Salvatore Babones argued that Indian democracy is looked down upon by international observers as greatly flawed, but actually, India is matching the parameters of a democracy rather well. He basically complimented India that she is a ‘good girl’ in the club of democratic countries, unlike Russia or China, and he gave the concept of dharma a role in it.

My first conclusion was that for any society, Dharma is far more important than democracy. If the society and its leaders follow dharma, it’s a good society. If they don’t follow dharma, it’s bad. Fortunately, dharma is still followed in India, at least to a greater extent than in the West, in spite of diverse attempts to draw Indians away from a dharmic lifestyle.

One such attempt can be seen in the concept of democracy itself: Democracy basically means constant confrontation rather than cooperation. We are told that a ‘healthy democracy’ needs a strong opposition. Yet a strong opposition means, that almost half of the voters did not vote for the ruling party and are unhappy with the government. They feel that they ‘lost’.

What makes it worse is that the opposition leaders now need to keep their voters unhappy with the government and make some of those, who voted for the government, also unhappy, so that they have a chance to win the next election. So instead of unifying the nation, a ‘healthy democracy’ is the blueprint for dividing it.

Further, money plays a huge role. Elections are expensive. Much of this money comes from big donors. Those donors expect favours. Usually, they want more back than what they had ‘invested’. Even an honest leader would feel pressure to “return the kindness.” This can shift decisions away from the public good toward private interests. And what about dishonest, adharmic leaders?
In most democracies, leaders are rarely moral figures. They are surrounded by lobbyists, secrets, and temptations. This makes them vulnerable. The Jeffrey Epstein files exposed how politicians (and not only politicians) can be blackmailed or bought, and make democracy basically a joke.

Another point: a huge amount of energy and money is wasted on persuading the electorate that the government policies are good or bad respectively and to give the government another term or to change it. Certain groups, based on religion, language, region, or class, are promised sops because of the number of votes they carry. Policies are shaped not by what is best for the country, but by what wins the next election. Naturally, the temptation is there to throw numerically small groups under the bus, as losing their support won’t matter. This leads to heartburn in society. Injustice is never a good idea.

Another problem is that many citizens are simply not interested in politics. Many don’t vote at all – in democracies like USA or India, every third person of the electorate – and others who do vote, are swayed by friends or relatives.

On top of that, media houses shape opinions by choosing what to highlight and what to hide. Yet are they free to choose or are the media owners giving the direction? So, in practice, the “voice of the people” is heavily engineered. And one should ask for whose benefit?

Democracy also often prevents leaders to take tough, but in the long run good steps, like cutting subsidies or removing reservations, because they fear losing the next election. And even if a leader dares to take tough measures, his decisions get stuck in courts, protests, and committees. In times of crisis, this delay can be costly.

I noticed another strange, but significant point. Before WW1 most countries had monarchies. The brutal assassination of the Czar and his family during the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the start of abolishing monarchies worldwide in favour of democratic republics. The German emperor was forced to abdicate in 1918. Now, in 2026, according to Google only some 7 true monarchies exist, like Saudi Arabia, Oman, or Brunei.

How is it possible that in a short span of time, the whole world divested their kings of their power and got rid of their century old, time-proven system of governance? Some countries kept the king or queen as a figure heads; others deposed them outright. Naturally, this must have been orchestrated by those at the very top of the power structure in the world – possibly with the help of the two world wars??

So, the question is: was democracy pushed on the nations of the world, because it is easier to corrupt and blackmail newly elected, unexperienced leaders, than it is to corrupt and blackmail established royalty? And because democracy is also ideal to divide the citizenry and make them fight each other and not look up towards those at the very top who try to control all of humanity? Are the divisions between right and left, castes, ethnicities and religions deliberately heightened with fake news and even riots by the deep state, by paying activists? Did not the CIA support (or create) even ISIS and Al-Qaida?
It is unbelievable but, powerful men at the top of the pyramid also conduct abhorrent rituals, the worst of them involving torturing and murdering children – to please satanic powers.

It’s a dark world. According to the Indian Puranas, it is the rule of Kali Purush, where Dharma is tottering on only one leg. But there seems to be a positive change coming. Never before, had so much of those dark machinations come to light. Never before had common people access to what those so-called elites are really up to. The Epstein files play a big role in this. We should be interested in what is coming out and take it seriously. Especially Indians should not make again the mistake from the past centuries – in believing nice-sounding words from foreign invaders, when the intentions behind those words were malicious and their methods satanic.

India is still a relatively bright spot in the world precisely because of Dharma. Wikileaks had disclosed, that PM Modi is not only not corrupt but is also perceived as incorruptible. Yet this doesn’t guarantee that all powerful persons, who have influence on policies in the government, follow dharma and cannot be corrupted or blackmailed. Attempts are surely on to compromise influential persons.

The Mahabharata gives excellent advice how a country should be ruled, when Bhishma explains Rajdharma to Yuddhisthira. Ram Rajya scores high over modern, secular democracies – a dharmic, independent ruler who has trustworthy, intelligent advisors and puts the security and welfare of his people above his own welfare. Bhishma gives one more important advice: the Raja needs to worships the Devas (greater powers than humans whose benevolence is needed).

In contrast, ‘secular democracies’ have explicitly no place for the Divine. Science is meant to replace religion. We, the common people, should focus only on the material realm and forget our divine roots. Yuval Noah Harari, the famous Israeli historian and regular participant at the WEF, wants us to consider belief in God as ridiculous.

Yet our overlords (the global financial cabal) seem to take the invisible realm very seriously and take the help of demonic powers – to gain immeasurable riches and power. There are several whistle-blowers who spoke up, especially against the trafficking of children for sexual abuse, for their blood and for Satanic sacrifice. Several of those whistle blowers died under mysterious circumstances soon after speaking up. Some are fortunately still alive, like the Dutchman Ronald Bernard.

Bernard got into top financial asset management because he had no problem to put his conscience in deep freeze. His main goal was to make as much money as he could. He attended Satanic rituals ‘for fun’ and was amused by the naked women present, he said. But the breaking point came for him, when he was invited for a sort of upgrade. He was promised unimaginable riches, if he joins in sacrificing – children… This was the breaking point for him.

by Maria Wirth

Bernard tells his story here

child sacrifice ritual

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655
Title: “Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india-by-maria-wirth
(also available on amazon, but more expensive.)
Both books are also on Kindle

The post Let’s talk about democracy – and Epstein files first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Maria Wirth’s latest book is a guide in Shatrubodh
Communists, Christian Evangelists, and Islamists are at the forefront of defaming and demonizing Hindu Dharma. I would add HINOs (Hindus in Name only) to this Hindudveshi/Hinduphobic group. Maria’s latest book has 43 essays that answers several uncomfortable questions including the deliberate demonization of Hindu Dharma by the aforementioned forces. These essays also teach Hindus how to counter the hateful propaganda directed at us. I would call this a handbook in Swayambodh and Shatrubodh that every Hindu should read to deal effectively with the anti-Hindu propaganda and defeat the agenda of these inimical Hinduphobic forces.

Most hate directed against Bharatiya civilization comes from deep-rooted hatred for practices such as reverence for cows, murti Puja, and others that these groups term as ‘primitive’ and ‘irrational.’ This stems more from hatred that is instilled in Abrahamics along with a sense of superiority since the start. Maria brings out the difference between inclusive Hindu Dharma and exclusive dogma of Abrahamic faiths clearly in her essays.

Maria believes that Hindu Dharma’s openness makes it a threat for Abrahamic religions who believe that only their path is the right one. The biggest strength of Hindu Dharma is its resilience that has made it stand tall in the face of repeated invasions for centuries. Despite an overwhelming number of HINO Brown Sahibs, Hindu Dharma has managed to survive and thrive. Maria Wirth also highlights that these English educated Brown Sahibs are also the harshest critics of Hindu Dharma because they believe that anything associated with Bharatiya tradition is ‘backward’ and in contrast, anything western is ‘modern.’

Review of the book
In the 43 essays, Maria Wirth covers a variety of topics from Ram Mandir Struggle, Kanwar Mela to Vedic Wisdom and and Caste Questions. The book begins with the Bharatiya wisdom that anti-Hindu forces don’t want people to know. The chapter on Vedic wisdom along with the first chapter equips Hindus with the important knowledge about Hindu Dharma.

There are chapters explaining the ‘difference’ between Hindu Dharma & Hindutva, why Buddhism is readily acceptable & projected as ‘intellectual’ while Hindu Dharma is hated, if Germany is Christian why Bharat shouldn’t be Hindu, the letters to Pope and Zakir Naik and many others that keep you hooked. Maria has kept the language simple and the book has a smooth flow from start to end.

As someone who has been active on Social Media for more than a decade and has witnessed a lot of hatred towards Hindutva, both from within and outside Bharat, I found this book talking to me. Questions that I have often asked to myself, have been addressed by Maria Wirth with exceptional clarity and lucidity.

For example, a simple post celebrating the Ram Mandir verdict triggered many of my Christian and Muslim friends even though I had never been hostile to them or their religious beliefs. When you read this book, you’ll realise that Abrahamics are conditioned to see Hindu Dharma as something ‘evil’ and its followers who would receive hellfire for not believing the ‘one true God.’ Very few are able to move beyond this conditioning. Also, Hindus need to be thankful that we aren’t conditioned to hate irrationally.

I recommend this book to anyone who wants to equip themselves to take on the anti-Hindu brigade, in addition to gaining clarity about their Dharma. Maria has explained various aspects of Hindu Dharma with extraordinary clarity. We must take pride in the fact that we belong to a Dharma that sees divinity in all things and motivates its adherents to discover the truth within themselves.
(end of review)

link
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655
it’s also available abroad under amazon.com and is on Kindle

The post Review of my new book in Hindu Post by Maitri first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Then I asked, “are you Hindu or Muslim?”
“Muslim.”
“Please don’t look down on Hindus,” I said.
“No. Never.”
“That’s good. I mentioned it because your Quran looks down on Hindus.”
“No, it doesn’t. There is nothing of this sort in the Quran.”
“I read big parts of it and there is plenty.”
“It is due to the translation. One must read the original…”
“Come on, languages can be translated. The translation cannot be so off the mark,” I tried to make light of it.

“Actually, I am an advaitin”, he surprised me now. “Have you heard of Sufism? I came to Delhi for a spiritual purpose – to visit the tomb of a Sufi Master.”
“Oh nice. I am also an Advaitin. Advaita comes from the Hindu tradition. I was so grateful that I have discovered this profound wisdom here in India. My first book I read was by Swami Vivekananda.”
“My forefathers were Hindus”, he said.

Now it was our turn to enter the plane and we separated…

The post Boarding a plane in Delhi for Chennai first appeared on Maria Wirth.

This was a question on Quora to which I replied the following:

I doubt that you are a born Hindu. It sounds as if you want to ‘encourage’ other Hindus to reflect if “multiple gods work for them’…

And if you are indeed a Hindu, you obviously don’t know the basics of your tradition. Your tradition claims that all this temporary multiplicity is like many waves on the one ocean, or is like the multiple pictures of a movie on one screen. All is permeated by the eternal Brahman or Paramatman – Satchitananda or blissful consciousness. Names don’t matter, because Brahman doesn’t fit into words or thoughts.
And yes, not only humans, the Devas, and other beings too, are permeated by Brahman and are ultimately nothing but Brahman, like the waves are one with the ocean.

Even the CIA admitted in a 2016 declassified document on cultural trends that “the religion (Hinduism) has a sophisticated philosophical and ethical system, called Vedanta based on the Upanishad section of the four Vedas.”

Compared to Hindu philosophy, the theology of the Abrahamic religions has no solid basis. Their ONE God is separate from his creation. You must NOT claim that you are one with the Divine. It is declared heresy.
Obviously, their God is part of the multiplicity, of Maya in Hindu terms or of the virtual reality in modern terms. Moreover, how can the topmost power in this universe be biased against the majority of humans and send them eternally to hell? Only because they don’t believe in one particular person or one particular book?
But if a Christian, Muslim or Jew has intense bhakti (devotion) towards God/Allah/Yahwe, it will reach the one true Source beyond Maya and he can realise oneness with the Divine. It happened to some. But they were excommunicated (like Meister Eckhart) or even executed, like the Sufi Mansur Al Hallaj who famously declared Ana al haq (I am the Truth/God).
In Hinduism, people who realised their oneness with the Divine are venerated.

Think, reflect and don’t try to be clever…

by Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 or

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

Title: “Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india-by-maria-wirth
they are also available as Kindle

The post A dishonest or ignorant question on Quora first appeared on Maria Wirth.