There seems to be some “defect” in Hinduism, because worldwide, it is clearly not as respected as Christianity and Islam. Hindus struggle to get a fair representation for Hinduism in the media or in textbooks whether abroad or even at home.
This is hard to understand, because Hinduism has the best philosophical basis of all and is in tune with modern nuclear science. It acknowledges that the essence in all is consciousness (spirit) and shows practical ways how to realize this one spirit as true. It is therefore even in tune with the ever growing tribe in the west who say “I am spiritual, not religious”.
When India was ruled by Christians and Muslims, it was understandable that those in power promoted their religion as the best and denigrated the ‘primitive native religion’. But today, when there is an open market of ideas, why is Hinduism still getting a rough and very unfair deal when it actually deserved the highest respect, and how can this be changed?
One fine morning I realized what Hinduism is “lacking” and how this could be rectified.
Hinduism would finally be on the same footing as Christianity and Islam. (please don’t take those suggestions seriously, but unfortunately, there is some truth in it.)
It is simple.
The ancient rishis had left out only one important sentence after passing on their insights. This one sentence obviously makes all the difference whether a religion is respected, powerful and keeps gaining followers or whether it is demeaned, ridiculed and loses followers.
This sentence is:
If you don’t believe what we tell you, the supreme Divinity will throw you for all eternity into hellfire.
Let’s imagine Maharishi Vyasa, after compiling the Vedas, had added this sentence: “Whoever does not believe in the Vedas as the only truth, will be thrown for all eternity into hellfire by Brahman himself.”
Or after writing the Mahabharata, if he had added “Whosoever does not believe that Sri Krishna is the only true mediator between man and Brahman, will burn eternally in hell”.
Or if Valmiki, after writing down the teaching of Guru Vashishta to Prince Rama, had added that Vashishta alone is the true guru and whoever does not believe it will end up in hell.
Or even today, if Mata Amritanandamayi for example, who has several miracles to her credit and an unparalleled outflow of love, would claim that she is the only indigenous daughter of god and who does not believe it, will be thrown into hellfire forever…
If this had happened, Hinduism would not be the underdog.
Hinduism would be on the same level with the “respected” religions. In fact, those newcomer religions would probably have had little chance to grow, because Hinduism was there ages before them and it could have easily declared those newcomers as inexcusable heretics that need to be put to death.
In fact, not all is lost. Since the Bible and the Quran were written only after Jesus and Mohamed had died and several earlier versions were discarded, maybe Hindus still could amend their sacred texts?
Of course I am not serious.
But it struck me one morning that the respect for dogmatic religions is based on irrationality and how easily it could be corrected if Hindus would chose to be as irrational and if they would back up –this is an important ingredient – their irrationality with blasphemy laws. Hindus could take part in the one-upmanship of “only we are right” and threaten those who dare to dissent with death.
Actually, it is not so much irrationality but cunningness, because those who made those claims of eternal hell for outsiders in all likelihood did not believe it themselves. It could not possibly have come from Divine inspiration but is driven by worldly power.
The rishis in contrast were truthful. They were not cunning or irrational, and Indians – all Indians – can be proud of them.
But pride is not enough. Present day Indians need to take care that this irrationality does not eat into their society because it will lead to its downfall. It is not difficult to find examples for such societies.
Dharma finds expression through people who stand up for it and if necessary fight for it. Adharmic forces need to be called out and challenged.
It seems, on this world stage, a Mahabharata war is always on, in all ages. Yet ultimately, at a higher level beyond the dichotomy of good and evil, all are absorbed in the one eternal Brahman from whom all has originated.
There won’t be a huge cauldron of fire where billions of human beings will burn for all eternity. This claim by both Christianity and Islam does not deserve respect. It deserves ridicule.
By Maria Wirth
126 Comments
That’ll be going against the core philosophy of Hinduism- find the divinity within you by whatever means. However, the dogma in other religions find a parallel in our Smritis & Sastras wherein strict injunctions on how one should live with odious sanctions for violations are prescribed. Varnasrama division of society is intended to achieve a societal balance & an orderly development of vocations & professions. Such an order was wantonly disturbed & destroyed rendering the remaining Sanatanis headless chicken_, forgetting their roots, hoary past, culture & obligatory observances. Idolatry & festival pomp are the only vestiges, with a handful few struggling to keep the scriptures alive. Returning to our roots will therefore be more fruitful. Bit for their organised church, X-tians faith & but for their prayer regimen & obligatory pilgrimages the Islamic faith have no ground to stand on. So Sanatana Hindus – weigh your options! MW’s article is thought provoking, though!
A beautiful piece. Pranam didi!
of course i did not mean that Hindus should be as irrational and cunning
But this is the core strength of Hinduism which accepts noble thoughts from all sides. And believes in infinite noble ideas. Rishi says आ नो भद्रा कृतवो यन्तु विश्वत: । Let noble thoughts come to us from…..
Good creative ‘Morning thought’ you had, that explains the differences between Hindu and other ‘thrust upon’ India, so called religious expanse…. Great as always your proposition
What is lacking in Hinduism is that the Hindus did not follow or understand the words and wisdom of the great rishis, who said only the Brahman is to be venerated; however, the Hindus venerate other spirits, gods and goddesses in place of Brahman, thus disrespecting the rishis and their spiritual path, so they suffer. However, I agree with you on your views of Christianity and Islam. Their views are irrational and not in conformity with the Sanatana principles of spiritual evolution.
Sanatana Dharma offers multiple paths towards realization over multiple life cycles. You may start with Karma, progress with Bhakti and attain mokhsa through Gnana yoga. This could happen in one lifetime or many. Hinduism, therefore, is a framework towards realization. The point is that the design is all inclusive. Any Bhakti that clears the mind of all else except the target of that Bhakti is valid. The reason why we have so many Gods is also that, no matter who you worship, worship well and with sincerity. Just because people have given a name to their religion doesn’t mean their Bhakti is not included. Where there are 33 million Gods, two more wouldn’t matter.
There are seekers of Brahman (or whatever one might call it) and then there are the obstructions to those seekers. That is the only Good and Bad in this world. Dharma is about protecting that framework, the seekers who follow it and propagating it. Getting confused with names and then attributing dharma to one name is obfuscation. Please do not go there. You call it with the name of Hindusim or call it Buddhism or call it ‘Spiritual but not religious’ – it doesn’t matter. The rishis never bothered adding their names to their works. Identities do not matter. Principle matters. All names and forms are a distraction in the path of realization. “Vacharambhanam vikaro namadheyam”
Let us vow to pass on the existence of these paths – no matter the name. Let us not spoil the beauty of Sanatana Dharma by bringing it down to the level of names, books and dogmas.
Let the truth shine.
[…] Source: What Hinduism is lacking […]
Thought provoking article!..True analization of Hinduism. Every Hindusthani in particular and whole mankind in general should read the article and understand the greatness of our Sanathana Dharma viz Hinduism. Kudos to the author!
[…] via What Hinduism is lacking — MARIA WIRTH […]
The biggest defect in Hinduism is the lack of a concept of mercy. Hindus believe that all suffering is deserved, Karma. Hence they can be indifferent to the worst of human suffering. That’s why India is a cruel land where human suffering is daily ignored.
who said scriptures in hinduism are static? only srutis are unchanging. smritis have always been written, rewritten. only after the western education started to rule in india this trend has changed
Dear Maria
You have been striving hard to get to the facts about Hinduism and its values culture etc
as you have put across the facts clearly for all Hindus to read. The point is most Hindus do
not care bother to know our Vedas, Culture most of us do not know the real meaning of
what is said there and why it is told?
The greatness of Hinduism is that it does not believe in conversion so we Hindus do not
indulge is such acts. The Bhagavad Gita tells us how to be a good human being with various
examples but most of us Hindus do not know the greatness of this sacred book. This has
put us backward whereas a Christian or Muslim will have several quotes from Bible or Quaran
to tell others.
Our rishis are the backbone of Hindus as you had mentioned they are not irrational but we Hindus
must know that Four of the most striking characters in the Mahabharata are Arjuna,Karna,Drona and Bhishma . These men were perhaps the four greatest warriors of the era and were also well learned and had firm principles by which they lived.
They lived their life by different values and their lives came to very different ends. The Mahabharata shows that all four men were great in their own way, but three of them failed in doing what is truly right and therefore came to futile ends, their lives not serving the greater good.
Out of the four characters, Arjuna is the character who stands out as the hero who future generations of Hindus admire the most. The other three are remembered as tragic heroes. Their names are not associated with the same awe and respect as that of Arjuna. They all met sad deaths on the battlefield, fighting on the side of evil despite knowing in their hearts that they were doing wrong
There is a fundamental difference in the outlook and character of these four great men that was responsible for their different outcomes.
Pranam Maria, Trust you are fine and doing good.
I read your posts with great interest and with all seriousness and appreciate your deeply researched knowledge and interest in Hinduism and Indology.
In this present post I can understand and highly appreciate your sentiments and hurt that may have drawn you to this. Even I feel so at times. However, that wouldn’t be right and in-tune with the basic tenets of Hinduism itself. Hinduism and also all its roots upto the Vedic philosophy have one very strong basic element of ‘Truth’. Truth, Self and reality are inseparable from Brahmn !!!
The one sentence: ‘If you don’t believe what we tell you, the supreme Divinity will throw you for all eternity into hellfire’.
Is not true.
So it could not be part of any of the Vedic texts nor of any ritual readings or to be suggested in any way.
Have a lot more to discuss with you, may be sometime later we can catch up.
Thanks and very warm regards
Girish vats
Girish Vats Email:girishvats@icloud.com Sent from my iPhone
>
of course i do not want Hinduism to adopt the cunningness and untruth…
Good article, but what are the amends? Hindus cannot just start saying that we are the best. It is ingrained in the religious philosophy that all are true and as Sri Ramana insisted, there is a gradual evolution in Hinduism from dualism, to qualified monism, to absolute monism. The acceptance or rather looking without any feelings towards other religions has been our undoing. Great piece of writing indeed, and at least thanks to the internet and great writers that the youth are waking up to the greatness of the country and the greatness of Hinduism.
May I have the sloka by Vyasa on Brahman throwing into hellfire please?
Maria, a great irony, indeed. How absurd it sounds if Hinduism stood for such a nonsense as condemning to eternal hell or not salvation to anyone who did not have the same viewpoint. But as ridiculous as it sounds, it has succeeded throughout the history when the tenet has been defended by those two big religions. Using the rule of fear instead of Truth as a shortcut for getting converts, but at the end all jivas will come back to our Source. Still, we have a Dharma to defend and Dharma asks from us to stand for Truth and fight untruth. And this is what you are doing through your blog and all your involvement in the defence of this Dharma. Helping Hindus waking up and seeing the ABSURDITY of the dogmatic religions may help some of us to start defending more their own value and putting a stop to physical, mental and spiritual INVASIONS that continue till today on the part of those religions who have as their core tenet to DISRESPECT the other, to (try to) convert him/her.
Ayo…. how is it that people don’t get the irony. of course such a shlokla is not there, neither do i suggest to add it. please read the article, don’t just fly over it and assume things.
I stand corrected.But then all of us can not be intellectuals. REGDS.
no problem… i reacted like this because you were not the first to misunderstand. on FB and on Indiafacts it was also thrashed as bakwaas, Hinduism bashing…
Ok. Admittedly I was hasty. I felt the reply could have been polite. But congratulations on taking up the cause of Hinduism forcefully.Regards.
thank u
Bhagwad Gita in the Chapter 18th ,Verse 63 demonstrates a unique magnanimity which no one acknowledges,alas. That is a permission granted to be free from all dogmas and exercise free will.Even atheism is acceptable in Hinduism.However,people want a book,a prophet and straight jacketing .That to them is impressive.
Yet another excellent article by Ms.Wirth.
What you say is without any basis. Karma is an explanation for why we get suffering. If I go to a doctor with fever, he says you got the fever because you went out in rain yesterday and got drenched. He is not being heartless in saying that. He gives medicines to cure the disease. There are hundreds of ways to seek remedy for any given bad state that one finds oneself in, in Hinduism – So many pariharas – is all because of the mercy of the shastras.
As regards an individual, compassion is an absolute must. If I remember right, the Vishnu Purana says that if a person condemns a suffering person saying that he is suffering due to his karma, then he gets half the sin.
See Yoga Sutra
1.33 In relationships, the mind becomes purified by cultivating feelings of friendliness towards those who are happy, compassion for those who are suffering, goodwill towards those who are virtuous, and indifference or neutrality towards those we perceive as wicked or evil.
(maitri karuna mudita upekshanam sukha duhka punya apunya vishayanam bhavanatah chitta prasadanam)
Bhagavad Gita:
TEXTS 12th chapter Verses 13 on the qualities of a Bhakta
advesta sarva-bhutanam maitrah karuna eva ca
nirmamo nirahankarah sama-duhkha-sukhah ksami
devoid of malice towards anyone, is non-envious of anyone and benevolent towards everyone, free from concepts of possessiveness and ideas of ego consciousness as well as free from false identification of being the physical body, compassionate to the unfortunate, always forgiving, content and cheerful with loss or gain, tolerant, equipoise in happiness or distress, satisfied with what comes by its own accord,
I wish The Rishis
Good article. I will add that it is up to Hindus to interpret their religion now. They have to stand up and reiterate the goodness of their religion. They cannot do it unless a clear concise definition of Hinduism is created. The definition must be in 1 paragraph and be clear and easy to understand for all, and make the Hindus feel proud of their religion.
My definition of Hinduism is as follows.
Hinduism is a RELIGION that teaches us multiple paths to connect to the higher spirit.
One can chant mantras , Sing Bhajans, Meditation, Deity worship (multiple deities), Read Multiple Spiritual texts known as Shaastra, Yoga, breathe control, Yagna and many more.
Each technique is very effective in touching the Divine spirit of GOD
Teachings of Hindu faith are derived from various spiritual texts. The Vedas, the Upanishads, the Yoga sutra, the Bhagvad Gita, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are some commonly followed texts.
So Hindu religion/faith is a true democratic faith/ religion giving its practitioners the choice to worship and connect with the Divine in a manner that they enjoy!!
The question is, would you have taken up Hinduism same as you have done now if it was similar to the one that you left? What I meant to ask was would you have loved it as much as if it was same as Christianity or Islam?
We don’t need numbers, we need quality. If we don’t understand this, then we will never understand anything. This is why we can’t be like them and if that means we are number 3 then we rather be that then Christianity and Islam.
Like you said we would never be like them because we are governed by rationality not fear.
it seems it is difficult to see that the start of the article was meant as satire. OF COURSE i don’t want Hinduism to be cunning and irrational. its strength is truth.
i would want HIndus to stand up for truth. many don’t do that, maybe they are not connected anymore with their tradition and don’t quite know what ‘truth’ means…
In the beginning of reading I felt like something wrong as it is not a kind of your writing I am familiar with. What a spiritual satire… it is not only enlightening but also entertaining. Just love it. Thank you.
I did know that it was satire.
The problem we have in India is that they are white washed Lol, no disrespect to you. You may have seen this in an Indian media quite a few times , if you call your self practicing Hindu in India you are seen as non secular and therefore you are fundamentalist and this word is not seen from positive point of view.
Angela Merkel can openly says that Germany is Christian country but Mr Modi is not allowed to say this because of certain section of our society doesn’t agree with this views because they are brown English.
The other problem I have come across is that we are still beaten by the caste system stick even today , just the other day a member of my staff asked me because he was told about this in his college subject and he knows that I am a Hindu and he wanted to know where I fitted in.
It is very convenient for western education system and historian to ignore things like slavery which has enslaved and killed millions but they are still ready to beat Hindus with their caste system stick even today. One thing I can say about the caste system is, no one’s has enslaved or killed anyone for it like it has in days of slavery.
It’s always good kids that gets punished not the bad one, that is the rules of the world.
A great read and simple to understand. Looking forward to more articles dripping with sarcasm 😀
true, the good kid gets punished in our world today…
regarding caste i saw this article on Indiafacts http://indiafacts.org/why-is-the-world-so-obsessed-with-indias-caste-system/
Hindus not understanding their own religion is the root cause of all this confusion we were ruled my the Islam and Christian rulers the British on their part while quitting India dished out history books showing Hindus in poor light we still continue to believe all this. We do not have the self confidence in ourselves we are living with inferior complex once we shed all this and start believing in ourselves and our Vedas & Culture only then we will be known as Hindus.
When Germany can proclaim itself as Christian Nation likewise Britain USA they feel proud of themselves like wise we should proud calling ourselves Hindus we should call our Nation Hindustan there is noting wrong calling our nation like this. Of course you will have these left wing groups on their feet once we do this like when Australia introduced common civil code there was hue and cry immediately the PM of Australia told those who are against this can leave this country and go to their choice of nation they prefer immediately all these dissidents agreed.
We must be very firm with our views we do not have to crawl before these so called intellectuals
shouting at the top of their voice to be heard. It is only here that these so called secular voices
who indulge in defaming our Hindu Religion because they want to be seen as crusaders, for many it is fashionable to talk ill about Hindu Religion.
We Hindus have to unite forgetting our caste and raise our voice against these so called voices who proclaim they are secular protecting the minorities they are there to protect their own self interest.
Very succinctly put.We are not proud of ourselves.We need not be proud but definitely confident and know what we are, where we stand.Just look around to note how easily our girls fall for boys of other religions and how many girls of other religion fall for Hindu boys.As soon as a child is born in a Muslim family,the Maulavi or any relative chants-La illah illilah,Mohammad rasoolallah-in the ears of the baby.There is an imprint made and that is strengthened throughout the life.We don’t need to be zombies like that but definitely read the correct books so as to understand what Hinduism is and then no one will have to tell us how magnanimous is Hinduism.When Krishna tells Arjun in the Geeta–I have told you the deepest of the secrets ,now reflect on all and DO WHAT YOU WILL.This freedom to even reject everything is unique to Hinduism.Complete permission to be atheists,no rigid concept of SIN except as a condition of forgetting one’s divinity are the other unique concepts.Despite all atrocities and assaults Hinduism survived.That itself speaks about the indestructibility of the timeless order.
You are right Maria. In ancient times, Sanatana dharma had no rivals as it accommodated all paths, including Buddhism. They made Buddha into an avatar of Vishnu.
Accommodation with these monolithic religions has been much tougher, as these religions bring outdated practices of the desert, many of them having no relevance to the modern world. But it is really a miracle of God that the religion is still surviving. As Swami Vivekananda said, because Hinduism did not wage wars in its name, the blessings of God are upon it. Sri Aurobindo was asked by KM Munshi on the waning effect of Hinduism, and he emphatically asked him to overcome his lack of faith and told him that our culture can never be undermined.
And even Christians and Muslims have adopted many of the practices of Hinduism. This irritates the purists of those religions, especially the Catholics and Wahhabis. This gentle seeping itself is a testimony to the slow and sure influence. And I think the future Hinduism will live more in the western world, tired as they are of the dogmatism in their society, while India may abandon her ancient dharma if the present events continue.
Yes, the modern circumstances have thrown up a challenge to this religion. God wants the adherents to be moe aggressive. Vivekananda said that the future India will have the Muslim bravery and Hindu wisdom, but it will be good if Hindus also become very aggressive, The only challenge about adopting an aggressive approach is that people will start adopting all the outdated customs of the past. Hinduism is such a scientific and evolving religion, that it will be injustice. That risk has to be mitigated by the seers. Even in the recent Shani temple controversy, the seers were quite supportive of changing the rules. So I am sure that an aggressive Hinduism will do some good and give us the power to withstand these assaults from the proletizying religions.
I fully appreciate Ms Maria for her logical thinking.Any organization can not thrive without discipline Even though it is not a regimentation like Islam and Christianity there should have been some kind of fear psychosis for Hindus to unite.I was going on thinking like Ms.Maria that all the indiscipline brought into the minds of Hindus by the advice of Lord Krishna described in Bhagavad Geetha .After advising Arjuna to take arms and fight injustice even the opposition was his close relatives,he said.”What I said to u was from my knowledge.But u need not accept it without analysing and do whichever seems to be right to your commonsense and intelligence.”This advice gave all freedom to Hindus to criticize their own religion.Even an ethiest can be a Hindu.Lord Krishna should have told “Look Arjuna,I am the supreme.Anybody ignores my teachings,he/she will be put into hell and roasted in burning oil”
I do not think the rationality has generated any sickness in Hinduism. Hindu philosophy has classified mindset of people in four types.
Those who do not want to use the brain and they want to help others to attain pleasure with nature.
Those who want to use their skill of work to step up the society and in that way want to attain the pleasure.
Those who want to understand the property of universe (knowledge) to attain the pleasure.
Those who want concentrate their mind and breathing to attain the pleasure.
Of course, each human is a mixture of these four tendencies. But any of one out of these four tendencies could be dominating in a human.
The four ways of attaining pleasure are called as;
Bhakti (Devotion to some body inclusive of Supreme),
Devotion to work (karma-yog), Devotion to knowledge (Jnan Yoga)
Devotion to concentration (Dyan Yoga).
The human being differs from others due to its brain. Hence a time would come where most people will have a tendency to use the brain. That is the brain only would be used for work (Technology) and science. To get the best out of brain, Dhyan (concentration) is necessary.
Non-Hindu religions are based on devotion (inclusive of surrender) to a book and a God or whatsoever, the God that discriminates, possesses attitude of like, dislike, anger, revenge and what not.
If one takes such belief as a personal matter, it is ok. But when such persons become intolerant, they are inviting suicide of their herd.
To attain pleasure is a personal matter. How to attain pleasure, ways are many.
The aim of the life is pleasure. The pleasure is the truth. The ways are many.
एकः ही सत्, विप्राः बहुधा वदन्ति
I fully agree with MW. We Hindus feel shame to call ourselves Hindus. Apart from dogma in the religion like caste system and restriction in to entering Temple of Dalits/schedule caste, there is no strict code of conduct amongst Hindus. Muslims, ladies even pray 5 times a day, gents wear caps in Masjids whilst praying and so also christians for whom visiting Church once a week is a must. We, Hindus feel proud by not visiting temple even for months or years, terming us as so called secular. For party cadres of party in India visiting Puja pendals during Durga Puja is prohibited so as not displease the Muslim voters and show others their sincerity in maintaining secularism. So called intellectuals and media people though Hindu by religion, criticise any move of present govt to rationalise and bring in Common Code of Conduct for all citizens of India. Recently, in Bangladesh, a sizable nos of Koran reading persons were saved and rest all killed by IS Jihadis because they love their religion and are ready to die, for the sake of their belief in religion. I of course do not belief in that sort of fanaticism. What I mean to say that, forget about sacrifice of life, I doubt whether few of us would stand to oppose the onslaught on our religion. Thousands of Kashmir Hindus are leading a miserable life in Delhi and Jammu for a decade or more. This is because we Hindus are not united, divided between various sects and groups and moreover,being self centered, we do not think of betterment of our religion. Hindu religion preaches tolerance,non-violence and believing in brotherhood as we see in others a reflection of our own Brahma. But to practice a principle/spiritual act that drowns us may not be tolerated any longer, what I feel. We have to be united and raise our voice for remedial measure. I appreciate MW, who loves Hinduism and suggests remedial measure for survival of it. Because she loves the religion very much and she is pained to see its downfall. I have gone through a number comments of well learned, having wide and vast knowledge in Hindu philosophy disagreeing with her view but I feel there should be some imposition or fear, so that the lives of Hindus are streamlined to save the decaying religion in India.
Dear Maria,
Knowing your pulse, the satire was so clear to me even from the beginning. Maybe some newcomers to your blog have got it wrong, but the writing is clear, as ever. Pray continue your good work for the cause of Hinduism, throughout this life….. and the next…. and the next…
Warm regards,
R.Ramasubramaniam
I respect your sentiments.But there is a naked truth which people will deny.Hindus are cowards generally.They will not retaliate for injustices done to them.THEY WILL TAKE SHELTER UNDER bloody non sense secularism!Thereby our opponents are getting courage to do more and more atrocities.No govt will come to the rescue of Hindus.They will support only vote bank religions.SO UNLESS HINDUS ARE MAKING VOTE BANKS,THERE IS NO ESCAPE.FOR THAT UNITY IS REQUIRED. Only god can save this country.
My thoughts exactly.Just read Islamic Jihad or any other even better book about how invaders from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran came in with relatively few soldiers and took many times more slaves.We do not even today know how to stand up for our rights without any political ideology.Aping the West is common.Just see fow outrages occur,something else goes viral instead of sending the same to the correct authority and using typical terms such as sexist,racist,misogyny etc.There is hardly any original thinking apart from meekness hence I included this.Regards
I have always found proselytization to be driven by cunning. A person tells another, usually someone in distress, ‘My God will take care of your problems. Why don’t I pray for you?’ The next step is ‘Would you like to come with me to my place of worship? You will meet my friends and see how much our God has helped them.’ The thing that bothers me is that you have to be a bigot in your heart to tell another human being that his God is not worthwhile and, therefore, he should switch allegiance to ‘the one and only God.’ How can anyone be irrational enough to claim such a thing? I am glad Hinduism is a rational way of thinking, and respects each person’s right to develop a bhava with God as he imagines Him.
We used to have various indigenous, shamanic and pagan cultures. And those traditions seem to have had their focus on self-cultivation, respect for Earth and for the universal benevolent lifeforce that is larger than ourselves (God/ Source/ the Divine). Just like Sanatana Dharma does.
Religions in contrast don’t encourage people to be self-empowered, to feel and think for themselves. Religions focus on faith, hope and wait for fulfillment, using the concepts of judgement, sin, guilt and punishment a main tools to manipulate people. Installing fear to make them obedient. Plus: Reincarnation (karma) is denied by all the main monotheistic religions of the world. Encountering suffering and unhappiness, for example Christians say “It is God’s will”. Self-responsibility, bye bye.
This way, humans got cut off from their own intelligence, inherent intuition and cut off from their sexuality (= vitality, lifeforce, creativity) and healing powers.
What remains of human life? An eternal restlessness resulting in addictions (to sex, control, power, status, possessions, substances) as substitute for inner fulfillment. While the exclusion of intuitive (female) powers and imagination leads to intellectualisation, dullness and heteronomy. Hearts are malnourished or closed, and souls are covered by muck, which brings all sorts of twisted beliefs and disfunctional behaviours.
In view of the global situation, it is exactly this inner emptiness, clutter and spiritual bankruptcy that has lead to the environmental, politcal, economic and religious mess we’re in. As within, so without.
Creating and maintaining respectful, friendly and loving relations with nature and all beings would be the first step forward. Humans have to drop the urge to fight – but also drop “clueless love-and-light fluffiness”. Instead practice drama-immunity and allow awakened information and holistic high purpose alternatives to be spread.
Thanks to you, Maria, for contributing such refreshing and thought provoking posts and talks!
Excellent Maria
May your tribe increase!
You have rightly identified the root cause of a section of humanity going against the Sanatana Dharma of the honestly great rishis of yore – its called CUNNING – A social cunning has help push power agendas…. And what the rishis have truly called out for one to progress into aadhyatmic life is THYAGA – Yes, the renunciation of this cunning & the power to be in tune with TRUTH…This is THE essence of Sanatana Dharma …. And you arrived at it thru an ‘inverse’ or corrolary examination of the dominant abrahamic religious power structures & its lacking in Dharma
Kudos!
If rishis & dharma is so vulnerable to a hijack by these ‘cunning’ forces, then who will protect them…? That’s where the rajdharma of the practitioners at various levels of maturity and progress comes in- the lesser aadhyatmically evolved will protect & fight for the more aadhyatmically evolved…
Namaste Maria,
I very recently found this blog and this is my first comment here. You have many good posts. Keep up the good job.
Reading through the comments, many people have presented the idea that the defect in Hinduism is that majority of Hindus do not [correctly] understand their religion, and are confused about many things. However that is not a ‘defect’; it is a symptom. The defect, or more accurately, the ‘shortcoming’ lies somewhere else.
The shortcoming is that the Hindus lack the equivalent of Zakir Naiks. What do I mean by that? Zakir may or may not be a scholar or a ‘guru’ of Islam, but he is very good at marketing and selling Islam AND is fully dedicated to use his knowledge and skills to sell Islam! Now since Hinduism does not proselytize, we cannot “sell” to others. But we do need people who can explain Hinduism to others so that people, including Hindus, are not confused. These people would also need to ‘market’ Hinduism, so that people at least have a CORRECT understanding of Hinduism.
If enough Hindus dedicate themselves to studying Hinduism, and make quality material available at quality locations (like this blog 🙂 ) then that will take care of the shortcoming and fix the ‘defect’ of Hinduism.
People should also study marketing and selling, not because we intend to proselytize, but because studying these subjects gives a better idea of how people think, how to interact with them, and how to explain Hindu ideas in a manner that is easily understandable.
Thank you for having this great blog.
fully agree that knowledge about Hindu Dharma needs to spread and also the awareness how much it scores over the dogmatic relgiions that rely on blind belief and put the mind into a straight jacket.
i tried 3 times to put an article into mainstream (Pioneer, and opinon page in Hindu) but it didn’t work.
i don’t know about marketing. but everyone is free to take the articles and put them on websites or share in their circles.
I agree with ur idea of finding Hindu preachers to popularize Hinduism.In Kerala there are 2 personalities doing this job.One Sasikla teacher in local language Malayalam and Dr.N.Gopalakrishnan ,a retired scientist from ISRO who’s speeches are in both English and Malayalam.Both are in youtube also.Search Gopalakrishnan’s site in Google The latter is touring world over and giving enlightened lectures .There are people in Hindi belt also doing commendable job.But I feel Hinduism lacks militensy to fight back.
You can count me in. I will be sharing your articles on my Google page 🙂
“But I feel Hinduism lacks militensy to fight back.”
The ‘fight back’ has to happen on many frontiers. Various types of groups already exist among Hindus, e.g. Shiv Sena, RSS, VHP, political parties etc, who are tackling the opponents of Hinduism in one way or another. But despite all this, the Left continues to have an upper hand, Islam keeps growing, and Hinduism continues to suffer. The reason for that is that a few frontiers are undefended, especially education (regarding Hinduism). I do not mean to say that Hinduism should be taught [more aggressively] in schools. What I mean is that it should be taught outside of schools (by parents, community leaders, movies, etc).
When Zakir Naik gives his lectures and points out things regarding Hinduism, many people actually fall for it, because they do not know enough (regarding Hinduism) to realize that Zakir’s claims are fundamentally incorrect. If they knew, they would know that Zakir and other dawa-ists like him are fools. This is an example of an undefended frontier.
Then there also are frontiers that are open yet Hindus are not taking advantage of them. A simple example is a challenge 15 years ago by Zakir Naik to Hindus asking them to prove that Lord Ganesha is God. His video with challenge is available on youtube. This challenge is not too difficult to meet, yet no one has posted a response to it (whether in video or in article). 15 years and no response!! I cannot think of a worse example where people did not take advantage of a frontier that is wide open to exploit!
[If some reader believes I am wrong, and knows of an article/video that meets that challenge, please provide me a link to it, because I want to share it with as many people as I can.]
[Note: Sri Sri Ravi Shankar did post a response on his Facebook page. However, that response uses ideas and language very difficult to comprehend for most Hindus, let alone non-Hindus. So effectively, Zakir’s challenge is unanswered.]
I strongly believe that if these two frontiers, 1) education and promoting Hinduism, and 2) meeting challenges by opponents, are taken care of, militancy would not even be needed. The higher quality of Hindu ideas by itself will make everyone realize that if they are not following Hinduism, they are wasting their lives!
You have said a very valid thing. I agree with most of it.
However there is a danger of digestion of Hinduism in the west by “spiritual but not religious” people who are actually spiritual aspirants but without the touch with actual hardcore spirituality of Hinduism (Gita/ Upanishads/ Yoga Sutra/ Yoga Vasishta/ Tripura Rahasya..). They will be torn down by the Abrahamic faiths for the lack of scriptures, Let’s face it, Abrahamics are good at ridiculing others coz they will always have expansionist mindset, while these “spiritual but not religious” types are content for themselves.
Buddhism is a great philosophy, but it lacks God. This has been used by the Abrahamics to their advantage by scaring Buddhists of hellfire/heaven. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kashmir and even parts of Bangladesh were Buddhist majority countries, but they were easily conquered because of both “god” & non-confrontational attitude of Buddhists. Buddhist philosophy is only respected where people are either Atheist/Agnostic or of Hindu/Jain/Sikh background.
Thus there is a necessity to protect Spirituality of India in the name of Hinduism or Buddhism, rather than spirituality. Of course only until the Abrahamic religions lose their expansionist attitude, after that the whole world should merge in spirituality without the necessity to have names.
I suggest to open .Dr.N Gopalakrishnan is the chief.U can contact him.He will answer ur query . NP
I think Hindus (and Buddhists) are seen as an easy target when compared to Jews and Muslims; academics and journalists are terrified of writing anything critical of the latter two, whereas slander passes for mainstream research in the case of the former http://swarajyamag.com/commentary/wendy-doniger-and-hindu-studies
thanks
Read your history.
http://www.hinduhistory.info/the-worlds-longest-unknown-war/
Please read history carefully. Sita Ram Goel has done excellent work in this regard. http://www.voiceofdharma.org/books/hhrmi/
Maria,
What did I just read? Are you saying people are holding on to Christianity cause they are fearful of hell fire? … I understand Islam people are afraid of getting beheaded so don’t want to comment on it.
You say you were a Christian … and now you are a Hindu.
In my case I was a Hindu a Native at that … and now a Christian.
Now answer me this question on karma theory.
If a child (3 year old) is raped and killed, According to karma theory, this child was supposed to die like that cause her atman did the same in her past life. Now how did she get this atman? … an atman with some real bad karma was daggling somewhere in the sky waiting to infect some sperm or egg or a fertilized egg, I wonder how the choice is made here and infect an innocent child who is yet to see the light of day. Is this what you believe in?
I rather believe and have faith in the GOD that came and died a horrible death for my Sins and extends his Grace to provide me salvation. And If I reject it I condemn myself to hell … And you know what I deserve it. I wonder what kind of Christian were you… if you didn’t understand this? A namesake one for sure.
Respected Maria ji,
What I understand is that Hinduism or Sanatan Vaidik Culture is lacking nothing ; but most of the so-called Hindus (due to several reasons) are lacking Hinduism.
Respected Maria ji , Pranaam.
What I confidently believe is that
” Real & Genuine Hinduism or Sanatan Vaidik (Vedic) Culture lacks nothing, and is Optimal in every Sense & Aspect. But , it is the So-called Hindus who (due to several reasons) are lacking this Hinduism. “
actually the same thought i expressed once at quora in reply to a question about the drawbacks of Hinduism…
“And If I reject it I condemn myself to hell … And you know what I deserve it.”
Jabs, do you understand that ‘atman’ is none other than the soul, the same soul whose presence makes the body ALIVE?
If you do, then please answer this question: If you think it is totally reasonable to have the belief that people deserve eternal Hell for not believing that “Jesus died for our sins”, even though lots of people call such belief silly, then why do you think it is unreasonable for Hindus to have their own belief- that the bad things that happen to people (including children) are because of past karma?
Ya I love your readings about hinduism and Hinduism is not religion. It’s an understanding of our soul which is permeated in each and every beings but because of misinterpretation of scriptures we are understanding wrongly and still there are real masters who has given us true knowledge but even Jesus and prophet has also given us same knowledge but because lack of knowledge and self experience they are criticising it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfcNNfNlaok
This above link will tell you, what is really lacking in Hinduism.
I have lot of friends from different communities but now a days, everything is linked to religion or caste. Hindus are treating their fellow Hindus like this. What more can we expect from such hooliganism from the so called right wing parties? Now the right wing group thinks that MODI is their new Messiah. We need to consider these acts also under TERRORISM. Do you think that VEDAS did justice to these poor people.
We can write lot about our culture (Hinduism) but if you are not considering your neighbors or brothers as human being then it would be difficult to digest. There is no religion with name “HINDUISM”. It is a way of life that any person in other religion in India can practice. How many people in India really studied the VEDAS or how many really wants to read this? merely 1-2% of Hindus may shown interest in this….
‘@accidental34 …
QUOTE: do you understand that ‘atman’ is none other than the soul, the same soul whose presence makes the body ALIVE?
RESPONSE: you got it wrong atman is not soul? you can check out Rajiv Malhotra’s explanation on the differences. The soul is created when the Child is concieved, but atman is not it is pre-existing with good and bad karmas from past life.
QUOTE: that people deserve eternal Hell for not believing that “Jesus died for our sins”
RESPONSE: The way you put is really silly. Let me put it another way … You don’t need to believe in Jesus if you don’t SIN throughout your life … No lust, no lies bla bla bla. If you do you condemn yourself to eternal Hell. GOD or Jesus is not going to physically push you into hell … :). JESUS (The GOD) has given us a way to attain Salvation through his GRACE, inspite of the Humans being imperfect. If I as a Human knowingly ignore this, then I condemn myself to Hell, Why blame GOD?
QUOTE: then why do you think it is unreasonable for Hindus to have their own belief- that the bad things that happen to people (including children) are because of past karma?
RESPONSE: Cause it is absolutely moronic to think a baby is a criminal cause it was infected by an external atman with bad karma. If you try to justify this lopsided belief, then you should also accept an external virus infecting your child as legitimate and not use any antibiotic to kill the virus. Jesus clearly says Children (who have not reached the age of reason) are first class citizens in heaven. Don’t come back misquoting Children are “born sinners” in Christianity, this is utter rubbish from the sanghis … Children are “Born Of Sin” of the Parents … there is a day and night difference between “born sinners” vs “Born of Sin”.
‘@Jabs
You only show your ignorance by posting this nonsense. Atman and soul are one and the same thing. This is true both for dualistic and non-dualistic school of Hinduism. I tried locating what Rajiv Malhotra had to say on the subject but couldn’t find anything. He must have been talking from dualistic viewpoint as explained in brief in this link-
http://www.yoga-philosophy.com/eng/2souls.htm
“The soul is created when the Child is concieved, but atman is not it is pre-existing with good and bad karmas from past life.”
You are correct that atman (soul) is pre-existing with karmas, but you are wrong about conception. When a child is conceived, what is “created” is ego. ‘Ego’ is the soul’s perception of itself when it identifies with the body. For example, Rajiv Malhotra, Barak Obama, Arvind Kejriwal, Priyanka Chopra- these are all names of egos, not souls. The soul has no name! When the living being dies the ego ceases to exist. As for the soul it simply migrates.
——————–
“Why blame GOD?”
Read my comment again; I never blamed God! I simply said that many people consider your beliefs to be silly (beliefs like if you do even one sin, you condemn yourself to ETERNAL Hell). My point was that you (not God) were being unreasonable to ridicule Hindu beliefs when your own beliefs are laughed at by educated people.
——————–
As for the rest of your comment, read my explanation of atman and soul again! But do tell me this- If you think Hindus are being morons to believe that bad things happening to children are because of past karmas, then how do YOU explain the same- Why do bad things happen to children and how can Jesus/God let it happen?
‘@accidental34
QUOTE: You only show your ignorance by posting this nonsense.
RESPONSE: Not really, you are ignorant on your own religion.
QUOTE: Atman and soul are one and the same thing.
RESPONSE: Nope sorry … Soul is created when the Child is concieved … there is no past karma associated with it. Atman is a pre-existing external entity with good/bad karmas.
QUOTE: When a child is conceived, what is “created” is ego.
RESPONSE: ha ha ha … I guess you need to re-define ego in your dictionary. But whatever you wanna call it … ego, self etc etc … the atman is external entity infecting an innocent Child.
QUOTE: I simply said that many people consider your beliefs to be silly (beliefs like if you do even one sin, you condemn yourself to ETERNAL Hell).
RESPONSE: Those many people are simply brainless ignorant fools to think they can bargain with GOD, And that one SIN (like just telling a lie) can have a very large magnitude of consequences, you may not be aware that’s all. And what is that just one SIN that GOD should ignore, why not 2 ~ 3 or 100 sins? It’s plain and simple when you sin you are in Satan’s domain period.
QUOTE: My point was that you (not God) were being unreasonable to ridicule Hindu beliefs.
RESPONSE: Any rational being will ridicule when you term a new born child as a criminal. Cause and effect is any normal man’s thought process, Hinduism is a man made theology, I’ve proven that with the lopsided effect of karma theory across many lives.
QUOTE: when your own beliefs are laughed at by educated people.
RESPONSE: But hinduism beliefs is laughed at by even uneducated / educated people. Let me know if you want me to elaborate on this.
QUOTE: Why do bad things happen to children and how can Jesus/God let it happen?
RESPONSE: There are more than 50 million people dying every year, Why GOD lets it happen? To answer that, Jesus could have killed and ravaged the Romans and the Jews just like Alexander the Great, but Jesus took to the route of Suffering and Dying, than provided the ultimate Glory by Conquering Death and Resurrecting himself. This is the reason why Christianity is the No.1 religion in the world. Similarly, GOD doesn’t interfere in day to day issues, He only provides Salvation to the deserved. As already stated Jesus/GOD says Children are first class Citizens of Heaven, In this case the Child is given salvation and the Rapist is bound to Hell forever … this is the ultimate revenge that Child can get. Read “The problem of Suffering” by C.S.Lewis for more details.
In religion no room for logic,or reasoning.No body has seen the God directly.What we know about God in any religion is some imagination of prophets or Rishis(agents of God).Ultimately Gods and religions are man made.So as per the fancy of the creator (the man) Gods are different and religions are different.These creations were necessary to see that man should not be an animal.If anything is done against humanity,that is evil.The claim that mine is the best and others’ are bad is the narrowest mind.And they are against humanity. I consider the Abrahamic religions are in such category.Swamy Vivekanand said all religions are like different rivers flowing towards one sea(the ultimate aim-the God or the salvation) So the path is immaterial.We can reach the target by traveling by any road.That is the Hindu philosophy most suited to mankind.
‘@Jabs
I do not see any point in continuing this debate when you do not even accept that Hindus consider the atman to be none other than the soul. You are like someone who goes up to a guy who is eating ice-cream and say,
“You are eating samosas”,
and then guy responds “I’m not eating samosas, I’m eating ice-cream”,
then you say “Nope sorry…. You are eating samosas”,
and then the guy eating ice-cream walks away knowing that you have lost your mind! He is not going to stop eating his ice-cream.
The Hindus too are not going to stop believing that Atman IS the soul! You can believe in whatever “infected” nonsense you want.
———————-
The response that you have given regarding how Jesus can let children suffer, makes sense to you. The response that Hindus have (karma), makes sense to them. Hindus are not telling you that your belief is wrong. But for some reason you cannot show similar courtesy to Hindus. What does that say about you? [Don’t respond to this question. People can read this exchange and decide for themselves.]
‘@accidental34
QUOTE: I do not see any point in continuing this debate.
RESPONSE: Seriously I didn’t expect anyone for this debate but Maria herself … but she seems to be hiding in a cocoon.
QUOTE: when you do not even accept that Hindus consider the atman to be none other than the soul. …. stop eating his ice-cream.
RESPONSE: You don’t seem to understand plain English do you? Atman is not Soul for the simple fact that Soul is not existing Eternally and Atman does … so why should I accept your definition of Soul to be atman?
QUOTE: The Hindus too are not going to stop believing that Atman IS the soul! You can believe in whatever “infected” nonsense you want.
RESPONSE: Anyone can believe anything they want, Who am I to stop … for the infected nonsense not only you, Even Maria, Rajiv Malhotra, Pundit Ravishankar bring whichever genius of hindu scriptures … I bet they will not be able to answer in clear terms … they will sure hide behind maya 100%. But still that will not answer my question.
QUOTE: But for some reason you cannot show similar courtesy to Hindus. What does that say about you? [Don’t respond to this question. People can read this exchange and decide for themselves.]
RESPONSE: I thought you will rectify your stand of showing victimization trends but you still persisting, so here is my response. My comment was to Maria Wirth’s blog, it was she who instigated this and she was supposed to answer, but she is hiding in a cocoon.
You pitched into this and now playing victim … sure let people who read this exchange decide for themselves. Moreover I’m in no position to change hindu beliefs … so my courtesy is default for your GOD given Freewill.
sorry, I got so many mails, comments and I am happy if others pitch in and comment.
Regarding soul and Atman, Christianity postulates separate souls and Atman is not a separate entity but one with Brahman.
On the other hand, soul is used for the innermost being, and in this case it could be translated as Atman or rather Jivatman – but it must be made clear that the underlying philosophy is different. The Indian view of ultimate oneness makes more sense and is supported by science.
Maria, please do not waste time with this jabs idiot. One cannot debate (or even discuss) matters with a person who does not even recognize our beliefs. (One should accept or reject a belief after having *recognized* what that belief is.)
‘@MW,
QUOTE: Regarding soul and Atman, Christianity postulates separate souls and Atman is not a separate entity but one with Brahman.
RESPONSE: Agreed, but the soul is not pre-existing, but Atman is eternally existing just like the brahman.
QUOTE: On the other hand, soul is used for the innermost being, and in this case it could be translated as Atman or rather Jivatman. but it must be made clear that the underlying philosophy is different.
RESPONSE: Thanks for clarifying this.
a) Soul is used for the innermost being … Agreed and is UNIQUE to that being,
b) Soul is not Eternal it can perish.
c) Soul has no oneness with Brahman, as you know there is no Brahman concept in Christianity. GOD is not limited by Space and Time, but he is the cause of it.
QUOTE: The Indian view of ultimate oneness makes more sense and is supported by science.
RESPONSE: Which Science? Please Elaborate on this. BTW I’m a Science graduate … so please go ahead.
And BTW, none of this answers on my Original Question …
a) Your stand like Christians are afraid of Hellfire hence they still believe in Christianity. Does this mean all Christians are saints and bound for Heaven? Don’t you know there is far more depth then this over simplification?
b) What is your answer for the Karma theory example I provided?
pls see https://mariawirthblog.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/blind-spot-of-modern-science/
‘@MW,
Thank you for that article, it was a nice read. I wonder how is this sub-atomic posting is relevant to the current topic.
BTW, since you are talking about Science, that too at a sub-atomic level. We need the theory behind some of those claims … which we can present to the International Scientific community and give credit where it is due.
QUOTE: Thousands of years ago they had claimed that the age of our present (according to them it is not the first) universe is mind boggling.
RESPONSE: Claiming something to be huge or large is pretty easy … How did they arrive at that conclusion? what is the theory behind that claim? What is the Number they arrived at? Do you have an answer?
QUOTE: They knew that the earth orbits the sun and not the other way round.
RESPONSE: I’ve read a lot of Hindus posting these claims online, but I’m yet to see any reference from the Vedas or BG or upanishads that make this statement.
QUOTE : Does it surprise that the ‘big picture of the entire universe’ which was released by the Max Planck Institute has an oval shape?
RESPONSE: I have seen quite a lot of Shivlings, but none which is oval shaped?
QUOTE: that this world is maya, an appearance or superimposition on that what is really true.
RESPONSE: You mean consciousness? … I know you are getting this from Double split experiment … but there is a rather convincing scientific explaination … at the time of Observation particles localize Space and Time. When not observing particles spread out in Space and Time.
Below are some Scientific blunders of Hinduism.
How old is earth according to hinduism?
As of science it is 4,500,000,000. i.e 4.5 Billion years old.
But according to hinduism, 1041 mahayugas, which is equal to 1 kalpa i.e 1 day of lord brahma. if lord brahma created earth on his first day of his birth, the calculations based on age of lord brahma, age of earth must be 155,521,972,949,115 years i.e ~155 trillion. … which is utter bull5h!t … considering the Universe itself is 13.6 Billion years according to Modern Science … Hinduism just missed by 99.9999999999 %
Hinduism claims … Sun is lighting up the whole Universe !!!
As per Brahmavaivartapurana which states that the Sun had set out to kill Mali and Sumali – devotees of Shiva. At this Shiva hit Sun with his trident. Sun lost consciousness plunging the whole universe into darkness. Maharishi Kashyap the father of Sun cursed Shiva that his son would lose his head. As a result Ganesha lost his head and the head of Airavata was implanted on to him.
Anyways you have a very lengthy article, I would have to devout a lot of time to validate your claims, which I don’t have the luxury now.
Moreover your simplication of Christians scared of Hell fire … that is the reason they are Christians is plain BS … If that is the case the entire 2.5 billion Christians would be saints … :).
“Dharma finds expression through people who stand up for it…”
Isn’t it the case that dharma is to be lived by devotees who “stand up for it” through their behaviour?
“…and if necessary fight for it. Adharmic forces need to be called out and challenged.”
Is that really the case? Isn’t the individual right expression of dharma by itself “the challenge” to others? If a certain level of perfection is achieved then I believe that others will automatically question and even absorb this ahimsic approach – as in the case of Ghandi.
LOVING THE SATIRE. That’s all I have to say. Also, thank you for being one out of the few people who speak up for the misrepresentation of Hinduism in the media at home and abroad.
‘@Mukundanpr: You misunderstand the concept of “Brahman”. Everything that exists is a manifestation of Brahman, so one may venerate different gods/spirits etc, and still be venerating only Brahman. This is what makes the Brahmanic philosophy spiritual and so flexible.
Even though I repeated the word “venerate”; the philosophy doesn’t direct anyone to venerate or worship etc; rather encourages one to “discover” it in oneself. The Brahman or divinity is within oneself.
We draw sensory inputs from outside (5 indriyas) which are translated into emotional states inside. Even though the Brahman is oneself (IMO a profound emotional state), a person is unable to perceive it as there are no direct sensory organs; ergo, one of the techniques is to use an external agent – different manifestations, imagery or even sometimes imaginary things to develop internal sensory capacity to realize Brahman.
this approach that you advocate works when people are generally good-natured, but not when brainwashed to be scheming to make their own ‘belief-system’ dominate the whole world no matter by what means. look into history.
Gandhi’s approach is not dharmic in the sense that he allows adharma to triumph.
Sister, I would suggest that your p.o.v. may open the doors for ego to express itself rather than the Will of God. This is the Age of Kali after all.
‘@Shan,
If Iam allowed to step in here, I must say you are painting with a broad brush I’m afraid. Gita says varna is not by birth but it is rather by ones acquired abilities post-birth. For the record, firstly, I do support the caste based reservation for some more time. Classification was to allow families to attain skill in their family business only not to suppress anyone.
With over 800 years of brutal savagery and worst kind of holocaust in all history unleashed on hindus by the invading marauders, the balance and communal harmony got derailed and they remained a lost cause for a very long time.
Are you aware that the middle east conflict is largely due to the sunni and shia schism, they both want to literally wipe out each other. Sunnis are the worst kind, led by wahabi Saudis, the killings of shias (hajaras), Ahmedias and not to mention Hindus and coptic Christians are perpetrated by them as we speak. And the catholics want to convert the Baptists and the Mormons want to convert all other Christian denominations?
Also currently Hinduism is the only religion that has allocated block reservation for the down trodden communities within its fold. Most chaamars are all practicing Christians, they cunningly call themselves SCs to avail the reservation facility. …But the real underlying reasons for attacks nowadays have property matters and such as their origins. Media, however, portray them as casteism wrongly.
Dear Surya Thank you for candid views all that I wanted to say you have mentioned here we still have the hangover of the Islam and Christian rulers who had invaded India. Can any one tell how did Hinduism survive all these 800 years of Islam & Christian rule this unique to Hinduism this is land of Rishis Land created for Hindus hence it with stood all the assault against Hindus
you are right, India did survive however much diminished. from the 1,6 billion or so Muslims maybe half of them were Hindus or Buddhist – Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Afghanistan, and Indian Muslims… and the effort to gain more converts or become a greater part of the population is still on
“Are you aware that the middle east conflict is largely due to the sunni and shia schism, they both want to literally wipe out each other. Sunnis are the worst kind, led by wahabi Saudis, the killings of shias (hajaras), Ahmedias and not to mention Hindus and coptic Christians are perpetrated by them as we speak.”
This is pretty inflammatory talk here, Surya, combined with some inaccuracy.
Sunnis are *not* “led by Wahabi Saudis” though I agree that there have been attempts by that group to lead the fray.
There are many many Sunnis I know that certainly are not of the ilk you describe, so it is unfair to apply a broad brush with one stroke.
And of course when speaking about Islam many bypass the Sufi (and Batini) elements and the positive affect they have had on Islam and the world.
‘@ mesh15,
Yes as Maria had clarified, Hinduism (and Buddhism) took a big hit with the marauders forcibly converting them and also converting their shrines into mosques. Thanks to the missionaries the entire northeast has been evangelized now. Huge chunks of Tamils, telugus have been converted in the last 3 decades. So thus Hinduism is truncated now.
As David Frawley correctly analyzed there is a doctrinal flaw in those religions without a doubt. What kind of God will say that you have to read a certain kind of scripture and follow a certain kind of messenger in order to arrive at paradise for after life or else you end up in eternal hell. Per Christians and muslims, Im afraid, all hindus and Buddhists will end up in hell and get fried , STILL ALIVE to feel the pain!! So if you are a hindu be forewarned and hence please get converted out today and gain entry to paradise ☺ ☺. On the other hand Hindus have conclusively eliminated eternal hell for ALL. Instead their doctrines talk about resolving accrued karma through Atman’s rebirth. In those faiths you get one shot and thats it. Hinduism is forgiving one gets many opportunities to correct ones course.There is no escaping of this karma as per the karma siddhanta. You reap what you sow. Life is a kind of hell, if I can put it humorously. So therefore I don’t want to come back again and again. I will lead a life of a hermit as for as possible and be done with it.
“Huge chunks of Tamils, telugus have been converted in the last 3 decades. So thus Hinduism is truncated now.”
I find that hard to understand. What of the work in that very area by Sri Sathya Sai Baba and his inheritence over the last 90 years?
In Hinduism we do not believe in conversion or forcible conversion we allow every one to think
and practice the religion. But whether it is Christianity or Islam they believe in conversion so they
practice what they believe. Iran was a converted in to Islam so also Iraq Egypt etc. Europe was converted into Christianity these are the facts before us. But in India they could not achieve what
they did with the above nations. Hinduism is unique because it has in his folds non believers who
are free to express their views they are not in any way ill treated or sent out of its folds, will Islam or Christianity allow this practice they will never whereas Hinduism practices tolerance.
‘@ John Lerwill,
I shall engage in a fruitful one to one conversation, provided I get some general background information from you: are you an Indian living in India, if so whats your mother tongue, if not, where do you live, your ethnicity etc., I need answers for those questions. Thanks.
Surya, as you should guess from my name, I’m not Asian at all. 🙂
I am a born and bred Englishman who has been married (over 50 years) to a Christian then a Muslim and then (now) a Hindu. I have also practised quite deeply all three religions. I know some Arabic as well as Sanskrit.
In fairness, though what you say is broadly true, in medieval times Muslims gave protection to ahl-i-kitab (People of the Book), essentially meaning Christians and Jews, and so there was marked tolerance for many years.
The Prophet’s son-in-law (Ali) was particularly respectful to the Indian culture and knew its wisdom.
So, there was no fault in Islam itself but the people who thought they understood it. And didn’t.
Off course there is no use to give any comment if the writer does not respond to your point. The discussion gets diverted to Atrocity on Dalit. It is a diversion of the discussion. The episode of atrocity is a matter of mindset of the people all over India which is the result of Nehruvian Cong rule of six decades on vote bank politics. Media is interested in making every presentation of news as emotional. The atrocity is related to law and order. The similar episode would have occurred had it been a person to any other caste.
‘@John Lerwill
Three wives from 3 different faiths. Quite a colorful journey you have had, didn’t you. Good for you. Sorry couldn’t help saying that 🙂
You are a spiritual exile mate, and you have been window shopping in the spiritual bajar far too looong. In reality, meaning in your subconscious, you are a charvaka. Our contemporary thinkers, the of likes of Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens have stood/are standing on the tall shoulders of those Indian giants. Time to call yourself an atheist and start attacking the dirt in religions.
“inflammatory’’ did you say? I was polite as a matter of fact. I worked and LIVED in Iran for 4 years and visited most of the neighboring countries there. I speak fluent Farsi. Does it make me more of an expert on middle east than yourself, if you say no prove it then. In their mosques and madarasas hate is preached not love. Oh please don’t start with the hadids, umma, Ali, Hussein stuff here. Already learned a thing or two on those. Go live in Iran or Saudi or Pakistan for a couple of years and see the freedom they all ‘enjoy’ there in the name of Islam. Otherwise in order to acquaint yourself with Islam go visit blogs of Taslima nasreen, faithfreedom.org. , ayaan Hisrsi ali etc run by muslims. Do you know muslims enjoy more freedom in nonmuslim countries? Even in Israel for that matter? All Islamic republics are oppressive at that? Sufi sect thrives ONLY in India. No muslim country allowed it to live. By the way where all did you actually LIVE outside Britain?
You wrote “But in India they could not achieve what
they did with the above nations.”
true they have not yet gained majority (and once majority is gained, usually minorities disappear rapidly).
but we should not forget that Pakistanis and Bangladeshis were earlier Hindus.
and the attempt to make Hindus disappear is still on – and very actively.
Surya, I’m afraid I don’t go in for all the sort of stuff you seem to propagate. There’s no point in attacking what’s what in the world *as it is* … the purpose of life is for us to individually find peace and then propagate that peace. That was the message of the great message givers and we should seek to find their original teachings, not spread discord.
And only if you knew all my life history would it give you even a tinge of ability to comment on what I’ve done or not done.
I wish you well. Adieu.
That is absolutely correct muslims enjoy more freedom in nonmuslim countries. In fact when Australia introduced common civil code the muslims there objected but when the Prime Minister told them that those who oppose it can leave Australia for their country of choice immediately all them accepted the law. Why is Europe being flooded with refugees from Middle East whey are these refugees not going to their neighboring Muslim countries? In fact in India the Muslims and Christians ancestors were all Hindus India should also bring the common civil code like Australia did.
Mesh15, of course “muslims enjoy more freedom in nonmuslim countries”. If you don’t mind me saying I think that anyone with a modicum of knowledge would know that! 😉
That’s not, however, what the thread is really about. Surya has *assumed* that I didn’t know that – where he gets his assumption from I don’t now! 🙂
John Lerwill well don’t take it personal well in debates we may find ourselves in such situations
so let us debate which throws various views one may differ it is part of a debate but we will come across some interesting views expressed here which we might differ in parts & accept some so let us continue this healthy debate
I agree with you 100%. Hinduism is very broad-minded and doesn’t say anything of this nature. But it definitely needs a protective mechanism. We certainly want to preserve our great vedic and sanathan values..
Today, I, as a Hindu am in a position to say something, though I must confess my knowledge about Sanatan Dharma is like a speck in an ocean. My state of insignificant knowledge is further amplified due to lack of “Realization”. Though the only saving grace is I attempt to “understand”. All this is because my parents ensured that my “spiritual” education started and continued with my “material” education.
They instilled in me a simple concept of “happiness” “balance” and “harmony” in life by constantly endeavor to balance “Spiritualism” and “Materialism”. Example cited was – Just like a cart needs two well-oiled wheels to run. You need to constantly “oil” the “two” wheels”, if you want to be happy in life.
Slowly but firmly, I grew something, which, to my utter disappointment and despair, was vanishing from the world due to total disregard for the “ethos” which is the very foundation of this Universe. In other words, I grew a “Spine”. I also developed the power to distinguish. I have not discarded “Spiritual” for the “Materialistic” or vice versa.
I am afraid but what Hinduism is lacking is – “Spine”.
Not the “spine” of “Islam” or “Christianity” but a “Spine” strengthened with “Principles” “Concepts” and “Ethos”.
The Western “Education” which came to India, first discarded the “existing Ethos” of India as Mumbo Jumbo probably after witnessing social evils like Widow burning, caste system etc etc. Or probably they simply wanted to establish their supremacy.
Sadly, that very “Western” Education has given the Indians the “Visa” to be more materialistically affluent and Spiritually emancipated. I, recently, came across a very objectionable discussion about Indian Caste System by very “educated”, highly “intellectual” Hindus located on the extreme Western Continent of the Globe. Words, tone and emotions used in that discussion was derogatory to their very own Country of Origin. It was evident they were sneering at their own Motherland without understanding the “concept” of Caste System and the social distortion of it. I did what my concious dictated – I “eductated” them about Caste System as mentioned in Gita, the underlying concept and also how this “concept” was distorted through ages. I received only two people amongst my many conatcts, a certain agreement to my side of argument. So the Ratio is 25:3. And that is a shameful one.
Yes, I think, people like these need the “hellfire” rod. They are not fit to be called Hindus or Indians. Reason being inspite of all their materialistic “achievement” they have ignored the insights of the Rishis as Mumbo Jumbo. Giving them the benefit of doubt, in all probability their parents never gave them the legacy of a “Spiritual” quest. The seed of “ignorance” was long sown in our Indian Society.
Most distressingly, our own people have chosen superficiality over self- introspection or more specifically Self-Realization.
Those people you mention are like sheep and donkeys. They are herded whichever way the powers want to take them using tools of fear and rewards (tools of the 100% materialists).
But do not be pessimistic. Positive change can be brought among Hindus even if this change is slow to happen. Gita says “karm karo”. Do not be discouraged if things move slow. Remember, slow and steady wins the race!
Do you have a webpage, google page, facebook, twitter, youtube account etc so we can network with each other? Click my username for my Google page.
Congrats madam for going deep into the Hindu Books and giving out in simple words, which most of us , who are born Hindus don’t know otherwise.
Namaste everyone. I have been reading blog posts and comments and feel compelled to make a few comments some which are akin to those already expressed so please pardon me.
* firstly it is important to be aware that there is no such thing as Hinduism! I won’t get into history. The correct name is SANATHAN DHARMA and I urge everyone who proudly follows this way of life to unashamedly refer to it as such. While others resort to self-help books/talks/psychology, you have naturally in-built mechanisms! Be proud!
* Sanathan Dharma does not resort to conversion nor preaching. You are born into it! A person not born into it can only follow the path and cannot then say “I am Sanathan”!
* Respect for all life forms is key together with willpower, intellect, knowledge and natural means for survival amongst other things. Human beings are the highest form of life on earth. Each person is born with a brain, a heart, legs and arms. Used wisely for survival is a no brainer. Don’t expect others to do for you that which you are capable of doing for yourself!
* no other faith is devoid of hatred towards those with different beliefs! Help is given to anyone regardless of faith. This help is via an individual’s own strength and means. Sanathan Dharma does not take from the poor to feed the rich!
* Yoga and meditation is your birthright. Be honored by this blessing
I could go on and on because I have barely touched on this way of life.
Blessings to all.
AUM
Namaste Rekha,
Glad to know that you have strong faith in Dharma and are proud to follow it. The one point where I strongly disagree with you however, is when you say that we should not do any preaching and that a person can only be born into Sanatan Dharma.
Such attitude is called ‘being an isolationist’ and is going to be very harmful to Hindus given the conditions that exist in the world today [and are likely to exist for many decades, if not centuries]. What is worse is that it is not us who are going to suffer the consequences of this isolationism, it is our future generations who will suffer. Fortunately, this all can be changed (for the good) by bringing people to Dharma (only via truthful education, of course).
The claim that one who converts to Dharma cannot say “I am Sanathan”, is illogical. Sanatan Dharma is a belief system. Anyone who subscribes to this belief-system and lives his life accordingly, is a follower of Sanatan Dharma. Who is more dharmic- A France born white person who does his/her best to live by Dharma, or a India born Hindu who regularly prays hoping that God will help him get a high-paying job so he can brag about being ‘successful’?
The other points that you made reveal that you are a strong person. So please tell me- If your being in Dharma clearly made you strong, would not this same knowledge make others strong too? You said “Respect for all life forms is key”, would you not provide access to useful things to those you respect, so that they too can have an opportunity to become as strong as you are?
Keeping in mind the above things, it should be obvious that the dharmic thing to do is to preach Dharma to everyone in the world. Whether they want to convert or not is their choice, but if they choose to convert, it is more proper to have a welcoming attitude towards them and to help them adjust so that they feel at home in Sanathan Dharma!
Also, please read this article by Maria- https://mariawirthblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/02/hindu-dharma-needs-to-spread/
AUM
Thank you for writing it. It seems a lot of people just overlooked what you wanted to show. What you’re saying is right; If Hinduism gets up and do what’s necessary to get it’s older prowess back, there’s is less chance for relatively newer religions.
But, you know a lot about Hinduism, so you must also know this too that Hinduism doesn’t fight back, at least not for materialistic gains. This religion, as a whole, is filled with this mentality. There’s a lot more that could be said for me to clarify what I want to explain, but I don’t think a comment should be 15 Million miles long.
I just need to say what I think it is. Hinduism is like nature. It works silently, grows and in that silence, it keeps affecting you in ways you never notice and when you do, you see that it was all in front of your eyes, and it heals and accepts us as we are. It has its ways of fighting back, exactly like nature, just not the same one that we think.
Thanks again for posting this! Love. Keep writing.
Reblogged this on Spiritual Consciousness.
By Promod Puri
OM PURNAM MANTRA
“Om purnam adah purnam idam
purnat purnam udachyate
purnasya purnam adaya
purnam evavashishyate”.
An ideological and free translation of the mantra begins with the word Om which is personified here as God. The word ‘purnam’ and its related derivates in the mantra mean complete, and signifies His completeness. As He is complete, everything emanating from Him is complete. From the Complete Wholeness only the completeness manifests. And even when a single complete is subtracted from the whole Complete what is left is still a Complete. The products produced thru Him may look small or big, but in core and quality all are complete units.
Read Full Article Here: https://promodpuri.com/2016/10/30/message-of-universality-in-hindu-mantra-2/
ASSEMBLY OF GOD IN HINDUISM
By Promod Puri
Besides His numinous and varied perceptions God also offers a meaningful perspective which can be created by the assembly of good thoughts. And the divine residency begins in that on-going construction.
Basically it is an eloquent temperament we are trying to build which gives rationality and practicality to the institution of God.
The ecumenical concept of God of being the supreme governor who creates, sustains and destroys the universe, and everything else including what influences our lives, does not reveal the reasons behind all the puzzles and mysteries of His or Her observable deeds.
In other words our perception of God as being a creator with His mystical powers which sustains the universe, can not comprehend many universal and natural phenomenons.
One reason is that man is just one of the millions of creatures who in actuality is microscopic in His infinite and colossal universe. Still our imaginations and metaphysical attempts know no boundaries to fathom His magnanimity.
For a moment let us compare a human being to a small ant who is trying to study God up there in the celestial world.
Read More: https://promodpuri.com/2016/10/31/assembly-of-god-in-hinduism/
a wonderful and beautiful piece
Hinduism does need publicity or forced on some individual to accept it. Neither Christianity or Islam will not understand Hinduism because of its simplicity our Maharishis, Sadhus Kanchi Mutt
Sringeri Sharada Peetham POORVAMNAYA SHRI GOVARDHAN PEETHAM PASCHIMAMNAYA SHRI SHARADA PEETHAM UTTARAMNAYA SHRI JYOTISH PEETHAM etc. Our Sadhus are in bare minimum of clothes they wear even in adverse weather conditions unlike the Pope who is dressed in Satin and with diamond studded head gear etc.
Hinduism is a religion which propagates humanity simplicity to understand this one has read about our religion culture which will throw a wealth of Information. Maria you have been from time to time writing about this this is possible because you are well versed in Hinduism by reading our literature and visiting various religious places to have grasp about our religion.
Maria the fact is most of us Hindus do not know the facts about Hinduism we are all to say
illiterates as far as Hinduism is concerned. But Hinduism does not discriminate such individuals
or force them to go to Temples or force them to read our religious books. This is the strong point of Hinduism its strength is derived by its openness, debates etc Any body can agree disagree but no discrimination of such individuals.
Christianity is very rigid in its views, approach one cannot say there is no God or stop going to Church. Hinduism accepts all into their fold whether he/she believes in God or not it will not convert any one into Hinduism. So this religion will survive against all odds it will be subject to mocking, criticism all this out of ignorance hence it is not Hinduism that is being targeted but Christianity itself because Hinduism says all God is one.
Majority of Hindus are not interested in adding followers from other cultures or spreading the religion. Also the stories of hinduism are complex and one will find the good, bad and the ugly in them, which might shock the typical devote religious people. There are also the aspects of caste/class system from the age of kings which is also a major deterant for the western mind. 🙂
thank u
There is an ancient legal text of Hinduism called the Manu Smriti. It was the first Sanskrit text translated by the British under their rule of India in 1794 and was used to formulate Hindu Law. One of the Topics it covers is Women’s Rights where a list of rules is stated on how women should act as well as the choices they are allowed to make within a marriage. https://formybrownpeople.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/first-blog-post/
you may also know that the British tried hard to demean Hindu Dharma, including even wrong translations. They must have been really pleased to discover Manu Smriti.
But are you aware that in the 12th chapter of Manu Smriti the option is given to change the Smriti if times change by a group of respected elders or even by one Brahmin if i remember right.
Smritis can be changed. Shrutis (Veda) cannot.
Do texts in Christianity or Islam have this option? do you want to comment on the status of women in those religions, several thousand of years ago or even today? just for being fair.
coming from a western ‘culture’ i consider the Indian culture far superior also the way it regards woman. there are numerous admirable quotes in the Veda.
pls see this link about women in Veda
pic.twitter.com/w0j0HZ3UAl
you may come to treasure you culture
Absolutely, MW. The ancient Hindu teachings need proper understanding and I (an Englishman) take Sri Sathya Sai Baba as the guide on this, not western interpretations. Having said that if the likes of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Mark Twain and other western grandees of literature and philosophy have been greatly impressed by the Hindu way, then that should be a good indicator that it is a worthy tradition.
I was about to respond to modernSikh when I saw Maria´s response. I would only like to add for modernSikh that “if you do not give value to your own culture, nobody else will do it”, like Pt. David Frawley says. And that there is more in common among Dharmic traditions, that should unite against the demeaning and disrespecting abrahamic traditions that seek only to impose themselves, being in fight even again each other in that supremacy.
“coming from a western ‘culture’ i consider the Indian culture far superior also the way it regards woman. there are numerous admirable quotes in the Veda.”
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think you meant to say [ancient] Indian scriptures are superior, not Indian culture. Indian culture, including the one practiced by Sikhs, has not been good towards women. Female infanticide and foeticide, arranged marriages (where women had little idea who they were being married to and had little choice of saying No), and harassment of women for dowry, have all been practiced by Hindus and Sikhs. Sati was practiced by Hindus ever since before Mahabharat was composed, and was only stopped by the British.
If it is any consolation, I have reason to believe that apart from Sati, the other evils against women were prevalent only for the last few centuries. It was as if the Hindus were competing with the Muslims to prove that they can be more misogynist. Conditions for women did not begin to improve until the British banned Sati and Hindus started imitating the west starting mid-20th century. And since it was urban Hindus who were most exposed to western culture, their women were the first ones to benefit. Plenty of Indian women, including middle-class urban women, still suffer all the previous oppression apart from Sati.
I am sorry but the rest of Hindu culture is not better than the western culture either. Hindu (and Sikh) culture is very materialistic and practices this evil religion called Social Status. Just as the followers of Islam, the followers of Social Status live in fear, are cruel towards others, and only know what they are brainwashed to believe (on TV and in universities). The only good value that Hindus have been able to retain so far is “respect for elders”. Hindus will lose this value too fairly soon (unless they radically change their ways, that is).
What else in Hindu culture would you say is better than western culture? Please give me an example. [Please note that I emphasized “culture”, not teachings of scriptures. Teachings of scriptures are irrelevant if few in society are following them.]
egoism, being intent on getting my way or advantage, rudeness towards others, not putting up with discomfort in a graceful way… come to my mind for westerners. In all cultures there are such and such people, but Indians are in my view more cultured, and even more so, when you compare the poorer sections of society with each other. A woman from Chile once told me that the poor in India have dignity which they don’t have in South America. A Swiss manger asked by his Indian employee what he thinks about India after his visit there, said, it is the only country where I was not afraid of the poor.
‘@Maria Ok, thanks for explaining what you find to be better in the Indian culture.
Maria Wirth, just AMAZING understanding of Hinduism. Now I am going to read all your articles in this blog. Are you a truth seeker yourself? I mean is your understanding by reading books on Hinduism or by direct experience of seeking truth? Absolutely delighted to read your article.
glad to know. i am basically a sadhak. check out also some of my replies on quora https://www.quora.com/content
Maria- your insight and understanding are valuable indeed! One thing, though- to say, “Present day Indians need to take care that this irrationality does not eat into their society because it will lead to its downfall” is exactly the type of contingent and proscriptive thinking and threat of hellfire that you deplore!
Hinduism is brahminism
Dear Maria Wirth
I would like to share the following link for the followers of your Blog
http://postcard.news/india-learn-small-place-bali-indonesia/
What should India learn from this small place Bali in Indonesia?
Indian religious gurus preach the benefits of Trikala Sandhya but this is practiced in every Balenese school. Here in India including a chapter of Ramayana or Mahabharatha is termed as saffroanisation of education but in Bali Gayatri Mantra is recited by every school child thrice a day. Are we Hindus even aware of the procedures of Trikala Sandhya?;forget about practicing it. We see some Hindus who appreciate Muslims for performing namaz 5 times a day but are they ready for trikala Sandhya?
Excellent point!
I think christianity was denounced long time back. During my stay in UK, I saw church remaining empty, with maximum of 5-10 attendees.
On islam, this too soon will collapse. What brought islam as force actually were the petroleum dollars. Otherwise, no world power on this planet ever allowed any islamic empire to even remain. The manner in which ottoman turks were collapsed by everyone clearly suggests that islamic empires are never allowed to grow.
On hinduism, it is exclusive to Indian subcontinent, and actually has no antiquity. It is just that people resisding in Indian subcontinent have clubbed the commandments, tenets, smritis etc into one fold called hinduism, and packaged it, though people who had developed these vedic knowledge, smritis, purans, upanishads, were extinct long time back!!!!
[…] article was originally published on Maria Wirth’s blog . It is being reproduced with the author’s […]
Wonderfully explained Maria Wirth.
I’m going to post a question on Quora “Why does Google throw up only juvenile Biblical and Islamic answers to philosophical questions leaving out the Upanishads and the endless sea of Dharmic scriptures, bhakti/ mystical literature, yogic and Sankara’s Vedantic works and commentaries which have profound and accurate answers to every conceivable spiritual doubt?”
Maria, as an intellectual kshatriya you have been inspiring and educating humanity especially Hindus who have slowly started shedding their inferiority complex and soul sinking sense of shame as they’re used to being abused by Christianity, Islam and the Marxist ecosystem in which we’ve all lived indoctrinated against our own scriptures and Gurus. I’ve been calling the global and Indian multi billion dollar anti hinduism industry (especially Mainstream media and news manufacturers) as #PopeStudio because umbrella terms like that are necessary to wake up this generation. I’ve seen also that pro hindu voices everywhere on social media which is the only platform we have also soon get blocked out. Are you blocked by Quora? I’ve noticed this with Twitter, FB and YouTube as well. Where and how are we to get a level playing field? Can we create it? Also I’d like to see you in conversation with Rajiv Malhotra sir.
Finally on a personal note I would like to offer my prostrations to you as I feel almost reverential towards you especially because of your humble nature.